Economia solidária, microfinanças e pluralismo jurídico: um estudo de caso sobre a Rede Brasileira de Bancos Comunitários de Desenvolvimento

Em 1998, a partir da iniciativa da Associação de Moradores do Conjunto Palmeira (ASMOCONP), foi fundado na periferia de Fortaleza o Banco Palmas, com a função de estimular a produção e o consumo no bairro, a fim de reorganizar e fortalecer o desenvolvimento da economia local. Iniciou-se, assim, a experiência com os bancos comunitários de desenvolvimento no país, que hoje já são mais de 100 distribuídos em 19 estados da federação, em comunidades de baixa renda e baixo Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano (IDH). Trata-se de iniciativas sem fins lucrativos, integralmente geridas pelos membros da comunidade em que atuam, que oferecem serviços financeiros aos moradores do bairro, informadas pelos princípios da economia solidária, com o objetivo de gerar trabalho e renda. Para tanto, utilizam-se de mecanismos como o microcrédito e a emissão de uma moeda social circulante local, paralela ao Real. Os bancos comunitários de desenvolvimento geralmente não possuem organização jurídica formal. São projetos de microfinanças criados no âmbito de ONGs. Valem-se, portanto, do marco normativo do terceiro setor e não são submetidos à regulação financeira. Utilizando o método do estudo de caso, o presente trabalho busca descrever o fenômeno do surgimento e da multiplicação de bancos comunitários de desenvolvimento pelo país, esclarecendo como esses bancos criaram normas próprias para regular as suas atividades, como essa ordem normativa funciona e como ela se relaciona com o direito estatal brasileiro. Para uma melhor compreensão dessa complexa realidade normativa, algumas ideias e conceitos desenvolvidos em outras ciências sociais são utilizados. Com isso, o presente estudo busca evidenciar os limites da regulação financeira e discutir as políticas de inclusão financeira e de economia solidária que vêm sendo implementadas recentemente pelo Poder Público no Brasil.

Citizens and the future of multilateralism in a polycentric world at 2030: the perspectives of emerging countries for the trading system: the impasse of WTO, the trends of mega agreements, the logic of value chains and the advent of consumers concerns on international trade

A new paradigm is modeling the World: evolutionary innovations in all fronts, new information technologies, huge mobility of capital, use of risky financial tools, globalization of production, new emerging powers and the impact of consumer concerns on governmental policies. These phenomena are shaping the World and forcing the advent of a new World Order in the Multilateral Monetary, Financial, and Trading System. The effects of this new paradigm are also transforming global governance. The political and economic orders established after the World War and centered on the multilateral model of UN, IMF, World Bank, and the GATT, leaded by the developed countries, are facing significant challenges. The rise of China and emerging countries shifted the old model to a polycentric World, where the governance of these organizations are threatened by emerging countries demanding a bigger participation in the role and decision boards of these international bodies. As a consequence, multilateralism is being confronted by polycentrism. Negotiations for a more representative voting process and the pressure for new rules to cope with the new demands are paralyzing important decisions. This scenario is affecting seriously not only the Monetary and Financial Systems but also the Multilateral Trading System. International trade is facing some significant challenges: a serious deadlock to conclude the last round of the multilateral negotiation at the WTO, the fragmentation of trade rules by the multiplication of preferential and mega agreements, the arrival of a new model of global production and trade leaded by global value chains that is threatening the old trade order, and the imposition of new sets of regulations by private bodies commanded by transnationals to support global value chains and non-governmental organizations to reflect the concerns of consumers in the North based on their precautionary attitude about sustainability of products made in the World. The lack of any multilateral order in this new regulation is creating a big cacophony of rules and developing a new regulatory war of the Global North against the Global South. The objective of this paper is to explore how these challenges are affecting the Tradinge System and how it can evolve to manage these new trends.

WTO: challenges for the next 20

International trade is facing some significant challenges: a serious deadlock to conclude the last round of the multilateral negotiation at the WTO, the fragmentation of trade rules by the multiplication of preferential and mega agreements, the arrival of a new model of global production and trade leaded by global value chains that is threatening the old trade order, and the imposition of new sets of regulations by private bodies commanded by transnationals to support global value chains and non-governmental organizations to reflect the concerns of consumers in the North. The lack of any multilateral order in this new regulation is creating a big cacophony of rules and developing a new regulatory war