International civil society actors in Genetically Modificied Organisms as a field of struggle: a neo-gramscian study in Brazil and the United Kingdom

Since the international financial and food crisis that started in 2008, strong emphasis has been made on the importance of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) (or “transgenics”) under the claim that they could contribute to increase food productivity at a global level, as the world population is predicted to reach 9.1 billion in the year 2050 and food demand is predicted to increase by as much as 50% by 2030. GMOs are now at the forefront of the debates and struggles of different actors. Within civil society actors, it is possible to observe multiple, and sometime, conflicting roles. The role of international social movements and international NGOs in the GMO field of struggle is increasingly relevant. However, while many of these international civil society actors oppose this type of technological developments (alleging, for instance, environmental, health and even social harms), others have been reportedly cooperating with multinational corporations, retailers, and the biotechnology industry to promote GMOs. In this thesis research, I focus on analysing the role of “international civil society” in the GMO field of struggle by asking: “what are the organizing strategies of international civil society actors, such as NGOs and social movements, in GMO governance as a field of struggle?” To do so, I adopt a neo-Gramscian discourse approach based on the studies of Laclau and Mouffe. This theoretical approach affirms that in a particular hegemonic regime there are contingent alliances and forces that overpass the spheres of the state and the economy, while civil society actors can be seen as a “glue” to the way hegemony functions. Civil society is then the site where hegemony is consented, reproduced, sustained, channelled, but also where counter-hegemonic and emancipatory forces can emerge. Considering the importance of civil society actors in the construction of hegemony, I also discuss some important theories around them. The research combines, on the one hand, 36 in-depth interviews with a range of key civil society actors and scientists representing the GMO field of struggle in Brazil (19) and the UK (17), and, on the other hand, direct observations of two events: Rio+20 in Rio de Janeiro in 2012, and the first March Against Monsanto in London in 2013. A brief overview of the GMO field of struggle, from its beginning and especially focusing in the 1990s when the process of hegemonic formation became clearer, serves as the basis to map who are the main actors in this field, how resource mobilization works, how political opportunities (“historical contingencies”) are discovered and exploited, which are the main discourses (“science” and “sustainability” - articulated by “biodiversity preservation”, “food security” and “ecological agriculture”) articulated among the actors to construct a collective identity in order to attract new potential allies around “GMOs” (“nodal point”), and which are the institutions and international regulations within these processes that enable hegemony to emerge in meaningful and durable hegemonic links. This mapping indicates that that the main strategies applied by the international civil society actors are influenced by two central historical contingencies in the GMO field of struggle: 1) First Multi-stakeholder Historical Contingency; and 2) “Supposed” Hegemony Stability. These two types of historical contingency in the GMO field of struggle encompass deeper hegemonic articulations and, because of that, they induce international civil society actors to rethink the way they articulate and position themselves within the field. Therefore, depending on one of those moments, they will apply one specific strategy of discourse articulation, such as: introducing a new discourse in hegemony articulation to capture the attention of the public and of institutions; endorsing new plural demands; increasing collective visibility; facilitating material articulations; sharing a common enemy identity; or spreading new ideological elements among the actors in the field of struggle.

A difusão de inovações numa sociedade em rede: o estudo de caso dos alimentos transgênicos no Brasil

Throughout the industrial era, the introduction of innovations by companies ¿ new technologies, new products ¿ has followed a downstream diffusion model, that is, from the owners of the conception and production means and governmental agents to the market. These innovations frequently brought great benefits to a part of the population, but ended up creating serious social and environmental unbalances. As this Diffusion of Innovations model became more and more successful outside the developed nations, the greater the reaction of social scientists towards the need of calculating the consequences and implementing measures that could provide an equal distribution of the benefits as of the losses generated by this model. What this work aims to show, illustrated by the controversial episode of the introduction of the genetically modified foods in Brazil, is that nowadays the diffusion model should incorporate the existence of an upstream movement, that is, from the organized and informed civil society onto the corporations and governments, which questions the companies¿ goals and production processes and the efficiency of the regulating institutions that are under the pressure of the global capital flow¿s dynamic. It¿s the consumer-citizen putting himself in as an active participant of strategic importance at the center of the conception and diffusion of innovations¿ processes.

A proteção dos direitos de propriedade intelectual e as estratégias das empresas de sementes e biotecnologia: uma comparação dos casos americano e brasileiro

O tema central de pesquisa deste estudo é avaliar se a adoção de regras de proteção à novas cultivares de plantas e à modificação genética, impactou as estratégias adotadas pelas empresas nos segmentos de sementes de soja e milho do Brasil, quando comparadas às dos Estados Unidos. Os resultados dessa dupla comparação demonstraram que, no caso do milho híbrido, por contar com uma proteção natural, o estímulo aos investimentos privados ocorreram independentemente da existência de regras formais de apropriação. Essas regras foram essenciais para favorecer tais investimentos na soja, como se nota na transformação da indústria no Brasil após meados da década de 1990. Além disso, embora a modificação genética tenha ocorrido tanto em eventos com características agronômicas, os quais promovem como consequência o aumento de produtividade, quanto para a modificação qualitativa do produto, a demanda do produtor agrícola concentrou-se pelo primeiro tipo, cujo retorno é diretamente apropriado pelo agricultor. Verifica-se ainda, que a complexidade do processo de pesquisa e desenvolvimento e a necessidade de investimentos com altas características locacionais justificam o alto nível de consolidação global dos segmentos de sementes com os de biotecnologia e agroquímicos. Nesses segmentos, a possibilidade de apropriação sobre os direitos da inovação, mostra-se fundamental para motivar os investimentos privados.

A construção do discurso sobre os alimentos geneticamente modificados no Brasil : análise crítica do discurso da revista Veja

Este artigo examina a construção do discurso sobre os alimentos geneticamente modificados a partir da ótica de um importante periódico nacional, a revista Veja. O quadro teórico baseia-se no debate sobre os alimentos geneticamente modificados no campo dos estudos organizacionais, no qual se verificou negligência sobre o papel da mídia como formadora de opinião e sua capacidade em influenciar os leitores. A contribuição para este campo está em verificar o papel da mídia na construção de um tema – os alimentos transgênicos. O método utilizado é a análise crítica do discurso. Os resultados da análise crítica do discurso da Veja sugerem que os alimentos transgênicos são construídos pelo discurso através de duas perspectivas, uma técnica e outra moral e o domínio discursivo é articulado de forma a promover a aceitação dos alimentos transgênicos como opção viável e benéfica de consumo, sem agredir a saúde humana e o meio ambiente.