Essays on decision sciences: exploring cognition, information processing, and complexity

This thesis provides three original contributions to the field of Decision Sciences. The first contribution explores the field of heuristics and biases. New variations of the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT--a test to measure "the ability or disposition to resist reporting the response that first comes to mind"), are provided. The original CRT (S. Frederick [2005] Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 19:4, pp.24-42) has items in which the response is immediate--and erroneous. It is shown that by merely varying the numerical parameters of the problems, large deviations in response are found. Not only the final results are affected by the proposed variations, but so is processing fluency. It seems that numbers' magnitudes serve as a cue to activate system-2 type reasoning. The second contribution explores Managerial Algorithmics Theory (M. Moldoveanu [2009] Strategic Management Journal, v. 30, pp. 737-763); an ambitious research program that states that managers display cognitive choices with a "preference towards solving problems of low computational complexity". An empirical test of this hypothesis is conducted, with results showing that this premise is not supported. A number of problems are designed with the intent of testing the predictions from managerial algorithmics against the predictions of cognitive psychology. The results demonstrate (once again) that framing effects profoundly affect choice, and (an original insight) that managers are unable to distinguish computational complexity problem classes. The third contribution explores a new approach to a computationally complex problem in marketing: the shelf space allocation problem (M-H Yang [2001] European Journal of Operational Research, v. 131, pp.107--118). A new representation for a genetic algorithm is developed, and computational experiments demonstrate its feasibility as a practical solution method. These studies lie at the interface of psychology and economics (with bounded rationality and the heuristics and biases programme), psychology, strategy, and computational complexity, and heuristics for computationally hard problems in management science.

Precificação de opções de dólar no mercado brasileiro utilizando redes neurais e algoritmos genéticos

Esse trabalho comparou, para condições macroeconômicas usuais, a eficiência do modelo de Redes Neurais Artificiais (RNAs) otimizadas por Algoritmos Genéticos (AGs) na precificação de opções de Dólar à Vista aos seguintes modelos de precificação convencionais: Black-Scholes, Garman-Kohlhagen, Árvores Trinomiais e Simulações de Monte Carlo. As informações utilizadas nesta análise, compreendidas entre janeiro de 1999 e novembro de 2006, foram disponibilizadas pela Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros (BM&F) e pelo Federal Reserve americano. As comparações e avaliações foram realizadas com o software MATLAB, versão 7.0, e suas respectivas caixas de ferramentas que ofereceram o ambiente e as ferramentas necessárias à implementação e customização dos modelos mencionados acima. As análises do custo do delta-hedging para cada modelo indicaram que, apesar de mais complexa, a utilização dos Algoritmos Genéticos exclusivamente para otimização direta (binária) dos pesos sinápticos das Redes Neurais não produziu resultados significativamente superiores aos modelos convencionais.