1 resultado para Evaluation of graduate program
em Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (362)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Brock University, Canada (13)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (5)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (4)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (37)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- Duke University (2)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (25)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (40)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (24)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (20)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (14)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (6)
- University of Michigan (89)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (124)
- University of Washington (9)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Over the past decade, the number and diversity of executive education (EE) programs have continued to grow (BusinessWeek, 2006). With the proliferation of EE programs come the challenges of evaluating the overall quality of such programs. What makes a valuable EE program to the companies that purchase them, to the universities that manage them, and to the participants that learn from them? The present research focuses on key factors that have served to determine the value of EE programs, and apply these criteria to evaluate the quality of a new EE program: The Corporate International Master’s (CIM) program. The CIM program was launched in the fall of 2013. Hence, the present research will focus on evaluating the CIM program in its first year of operations. It is my hope that this research will inform the optimization and future development of the CIM program.