Co-evolução dos componentes do marco institucional e das trajetórias de acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas no setor de agro-energia (etanol) no Brasil (1970-2009)

Esta dissertação centra-se no exame da evolução dos componentes do marco institucional em associação com as trajetórias de acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas de produção e inovação em setores à base de recursos naturais em economias emergentes. Esse relacionamento é examinado no setor de etanol brasileiro, no período entre 1970 e 2009. O marco institucional é operacionalizado à base das macro-instituições (os regimes complexos constituídos por políticas públicas), meso-instituições (as relações políticas e estruturas burocráticas) e as instituições baseadas em conhecimento (os institutos de pesquisa e as universidades). As trajetórias de acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas são examinadas à base de níveis de inovação. A dissertação baseia-se em um estudo de caso em nível setorial. Além disso, o estudo baseia-se em evidências obtidas a partir de fontes diversas, em nível de indústria, em documentos governamentais e também em evidências secundárias em nível de empresa. Os principais resultados desta dissertação são os seguintes: (1) O setor de etanol atingiu níveis inovadores de capacidade tecnológica nas duas funções analisadas. Numa escala de 1 a 5, o setor adquiriu, durante o 1º período (1970-1989), capacidades tecnológicas industriais (produto e processo) no Nível 3 e, durante o 2º período (1990-2009), o setor de etanol acumulou capacidades tecnológicas industriais no Nível 5. No tocante à acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas na área agrícola (matéria-prima), durante o 1º período, o setor adquiriu capacidades tecnológicas no Nível 4 e apenas no período seguinte atingiu o Nível 5. (2) As instituições desempenharam um papel relevante sobre as trajetórias de acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas no setor de etanol brasileiro. Entre elas destaca-se às atividades de P&D desenvolvidas em instituições baseadas em conhecimento, que acumularam capacidades tecnológicas de produção e inovação, compartilhadas com as empresas. (3) Entretanto, o estudo aponta para algumas vulnerabilidades do setor de etanol brasileiro no que se refere a sua capacidade de sustentar o seu desempenho inovador. Entre elas destaca-se: (1) grande parte das atividades inovadoras em nível de P&D é realizada a base de arranjos externos, com pouco esforço de atividades realizadas a partir das empresas; (2) apesar do enorme esforço governamental para desenvolver o setor, esse está direcionado (locked-in) à trajetória de acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas de etanol de 1ª geração; (3) os componentes do marco institucional incentivaram as atividades de pesquisa em universidades e institutos de pesquisa, em nível de bancada, que resultaram em invenções e projetos experimentais; (4) as condições favoráveis de mercado, a grande disponibilidade de cana-de-açúcar e a flexibilidade de produção de etanol/álcool contribuíram para a acomodação do setor de etanol, ou seja, parece haver uma zona de conforto no setor. Desta forma, as evidências alertam sobre a necessidade de investimentos em atividades inovadoras de P&D dentro das empresas (foco em inovações, riqueza e na diversificação para outros setores). Portanto, os resultados desta dissertação permitem apontar sugestões para gestores governamentais. As novas políticas públicas podem: (1) redirecionar as estratégias de acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas inovadoras, fortemente focadas na sustentação das trajetórias de acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas para produzir etanol de 1ª geração; (2) impulsionar a acumulação de capacidades tecnológicas de produção e inovação na trajetória emergente para produzir etanol de 2ª geração, atualmente em nível experimental e largamente desenvolvida dentro das instituições baseadas em conhecimento, e para diversificar os produtos para novos setores e linhas de negócio. Os resultados desta dissertação também sugerem aos gestores de empresas no setor brasileiro de etanol: (1) reformular as estratégias empresariais com a finalidade de expandir as atividades inovadoras dentro das empresas do setor de etanol, que poderão resultar na criação de inovações em escala industrial; (2) as empresas do setor de etanol deveriam assumir um comportamento proativo com a finalidade de coordenar os esforços de P&D em direção aos problemas e desafios futuros a serem enfrentados pelo setor brasileiro de etanol.

Debt management in Brazil: evaluation of the Real Plan and challenges ahead

The Brazilian domestic debt has posed two challenges to policy-makers: it has grown very fast and its maturity is extremely short. This has prompted fears that a default or a compulsory lengthening scheme would be imposed. Here, we analyse the domestic public debt management experience in Brazil, searching for policy prescriptions for the next few years. After briefiy reviewing the recent domestic public debt history, we decompose the large rise in federal bonded debt during 1995-2000, searching for its macroeconomic causes. The main culprits are the extremely high interest payments-which, unti11998, were caused by the weak fiscal stance and the quasi-fixed exchange-rate regime; and since 1999, by the impact ofthe currency depreciation On the dollar-indexed and the externai debt-, and the accumulation of assets of doubtful value, much of which may have to be written off in the future. Simulation exercises of the net debt path for the near future underscore the importance of a tighter fiscal stance to prevent the debt-GDP ratio from growing further. Given the need to quickly lengthen the debt maturity, our main policy advice is to foster, and rely more on, infiation-linked bonds.

The BRICS: some historical experiences, growth challenges and opportunities

The acronym BRICS was a fad among the media and global investors. Now, the acronym sounds passé. However, the group of countries remains important, from both political and economic reasons. They have a large aggregate size, 28% of the global GDP and 42% of the world’s population, high growth potential due to the current significant misallocation of resources and relatively low stock of human capital, structural transformation is in progress and one of them, China, is taking steps to become a global power and a challenger to the US dominance. This paper provides a brief overview of the five economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. We focus on some aspects of their history, the Chinese initiatives in international finance and geopolitical strategic moves, their growth experience and structural transformation over the last 35 years, trade and investment integration into the global economy and among themselves, the growth challenges faced by their economies and the potential gains to the Brazilian economy from a stronger integration with the other BRICS. In association with its efforts to be a global power, China aims to become a major player in global finance and to achieve the status of global currency for the renminbi, which would be the first currency of an emerging economy to attain such position. Despite the similarities, the BRICS encompass very diverse economies. In the recent decades, China and India showed stellar growth rates. On the other hand, Brazil, Russia and South Africa have expanded just in line with global output growth with the Russian economy exhibiting high volatility. China is by far the largest economy, and South Africa the smallest, the only BRICS economy with a GDP lower than US$ 1 trillion. Russia abandoned communism almost 25 years ago, but reversed many of the privatizations of 90’s. China is still ruled by communism, but has a vibrant private sector and recently has officially declared market forces to play a dominant role in its economy. Brazil, Russia and South Africa are global natural resources powerhouses and commodity exporters while China and India are large commodity importers. Brazil is relatively closed to international trade of goods and services, in marked contrast to the other four economies. Brazil, India and South Africa are dependent on external capital flows whereas China and Russia are capital exporters. India and South Africa have younger populations and a large portion living below the poverty line. Despite its extraordinary growth experience that lifted many millions from poverty, China still has 28% of its population classified as poor. Russia and China have much older populations and one of their challenges is to deal with the effects of a declining labor force in the near future. India, China and South Africa face a long way to urbanization, while Brazil and Russia are already urbanized countries. China is an industrial economy but its primary sector still absorbs a large pool of workers. India is not, but the primary sector employs also a large share of the labor force. China’s aggregate demand structure is biased towards investment that has been driving its expansion. Brazil and South Africa have an aggregate demand structure similar to the developed economies, with private consumption accounting for approximately 70%. The same similarity applies to the supply side, as in both economies the share of services nears 70%. The development problem is a productivity problem, so microeconomic reforms are badly needed to foster long-term growth of the BRICS economies since they have lost steam due a variety of factors, but fundamentally due to slower total factor productivity growth. China and India are implementing ambitious reform programs, while Brazil is dealing with macroeconomic disequilibria. Russia and South Africa remain mute about structural reforms. There are some potential benefits to Brazil to be extracted from a greater economic integration with the BRICS, particularly in natural resources intensive industries and services. Necessary conditions to the materialization of those gains are the removal of the several sources of resource misallocation and strong investment in human capital.

Citizens and the future of multilateralism in a polycentric world at 2030: the perspectives of emerging countries for the trading system: the impasse of WTO, the trends of mega agreements, the logic of value chains and the advent of consumers concerns on international trade

A new paradigm is modeling the World: evolutionary innovations in all fronts, new information technologies, huge mobility of capital, use of risky financial tools, globalization of production, new emerging powers and the impact of consumer concerns on governmental policies. These phenomena are shaping the World and forcing the advent of a new World Order in the Multilateral Monetary, Financial, and Trading System. The effects of this new paradigm are also transforming global governance. The political and economic orders established after the World War and centered on the multilateral model of UN, IMF, World Bank, and the GATT, leaded by the developed countries, are facing significant challenges. The rise of China and emerging countries shifted the old model to a polycentric World, where the governance of these organizations are threatened by emerging countries demanding a bigger participation in the role and decision boards of these international bodies. As a consequence, multilateralism is being confronted by polycentrism. Negotiations for a more representative voting process and the pressure for new rules to cope with the new demands are paralyzing important decisions. This scenario is affecting seriously not only the Monetary and Financial Systems but also the Multilateral Trading System. International trade is facing some significant challenges: a serious deadlock to conclude the last round of the multilateral negotiation at the WTO, the fragmentation of trade rules by the multiplication of preferential and mega agreements, the arrival of a new model of global production and trade leaded by global value chains that is threatening the old trade order, and the imposition of new sets of regulations by private bodies commanded by transnationals to support global value chains and non-governmental organizations to reflect the concerns of consumers in the North based on their precautionary attitude about sustainability of products made in the World. The lack of any multilateral order in this new regulation is creating a big cacophony of rules and developing a new regulatory war of the Global North against the Global South. The objective of this paper is to explore how these challenges are affecting the Tradinge System and how it can evolve to manage these new trends.