How does corruption hurt growth? Evidences about the effects of corruption on factors productivity and per capita income

Corruption is a phenomenon that plagues many countries and, mostly, walks hand in hand with inefficient institutional structures, which reduce the effectiveness of public and private investment. In countries with widespread corruption, for each monetary unit invested, a sizable share is wasted, implying less investment. Corruption can also be a burden on a nation’s wealth and economic growth, by driving away new investment and creating uncertainties regarding private and social rights. Thus, corruption can affect not only factors productivity, but also their accumulation, with detrimental consequences on a society’s social development. This article aims to analyze and measure the influence of corruption on a country’s wealth. It is implicitly admitted that the degree of institutional development has an adverse effect on the productivity of production factors, which implies in reduced per capita income. It is assumed that the level of wealth and economic growth depends on domestic savings, foster technological progress and a proper educational system. Corruption, within this framework, is not unlike an additional cost, which stifles the “effectiveness” of the investment. This article first discusses the key theories evaluating corruption’s economic consequences. Later, it analyzes the relation between institutional development, factor productivity and per capita income, based on the neoclassical approach to economic growth. Finally, it brings some empirical evidence regarding the effects of corruption on factor productivity, in a sample of 81 countries studied in 1998. The chief conclusion is that corruption negatively affects the wealth of a nation by reducing capital productivity, or its effectiveness.

Factors influencing supermarket store loyalty

Este estudo focou na indústria de supermercados e teve como objetivo examinar o quanto os fatores referentes à existência de um programa de fidelidade em um supermercado, a fidelidade do cliente com esse programa e a percepção de valor que o cliente tem da loja, influenciam na sua lealdade à loja. Como muitas empresas têm feito um grande investimento nos Programas de Fidelidade, é certamente relevante que seja medida a efetividade desse tipo de programa. A metodologia usada foi a análise de regressão linear. Nesta análise de regressão foram consideradas as seguintes variáveis independentes: Valor percebido do programa, a Lealdade ao cartão de fidelidade da loja, o valor percebido da loja. Como variável dependente foi considerada a Lealdade à loja. A análise concluiu que os programas de lealdade em supermercados não estão funcionando como instrumentos efetivos de fidelidade e não têm relação com o Valor Percebido da Loja. O investimento das empresas nessa ferramenta não está trazendo o retorno esperado de desenvolver fidelidade no cliente.