An ordering of measures of the welfare cost of inflation in economies with interest-bearing deposits

This paper builds on Lucas (2000) and on Cysne (2003) to derive and order six alternative measures of the welfare costs of inflation (five of which already existing in the literature) for any vector of opportunity costs. The ordering of the functions is carried out for economies with or without interestbearing deposits. We provide examples and closed-form solutions for the log-log money demand both in the unidimensional and in the multidimensional setting (when interest-bearing monies are present). An estimate of the maximum relative error a researcher can incur when using any particular measure is also provided.

Barreiras a entrada : o caso do setor de creme dental brasileiro

Ao se estudar as consequências sobre o bem-estar social de um mercado relevante onde há elevada concentração na produção, deve-se identificar, primeiramente, se a competição potencial existe. Uma forma de detecta-la seria através do exame das barreiras à entrada da concorrência no mercado relevante em estudo. O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar, no setor brasileiro de creme dental, as barreiras para firmas: entrarem ou; aumentarem sua participação de mercado. A motivação para este estudo decorre da mudança na estrutura deste mercado relevante, uma vez que, em janeiro de 1995, a Colgate, empresa com a segunda maior fatia do mercado nacional, adquiriu a Kolynos, firma detentora de metade do faturamento brasileiro deste setor.

Welfare costs of inflation when interest-bearing deposits are disregarded: a calculation of the bias

Most estimates of the welfare costs of in ation are devised considering only noninterest- bearing assets, ignoring that since the 80s technological innovations and new regulations have increased the liquidity of interest-bearing deposits. We investigate the resulting bias. Suscient and necessary conditions on its sign are presented, along with closed-form expressions for its magnitude. Two examples dealing with bidimensional bilogarithmic money demands show that disregarding interest-bearing monies may lead to a non-negligible overestimation of the welfare costs of in ation. An intuitive explanation is that such assets may partially make up for the decreased demand of noninterest-bearing assets due to higher in ation.

Welfare cost of inflation considering adoption decisions and interest-bearing deposits

Attanasio et al. (JPE, 2002) have used microeconomic data on households to provide new estimates of the welfare costs of infiation using Bailey's unidimensional welfare measure as a basis for their calculations. Such a measure does not properly take into consideration lhe fact that the majority of households in their sample (58.7 percent) holds not only bank deposits and currency, but also a second type of interest-bearing assct. This work devises alternative formulas which account for the existence of bank deposits and a sccond interest-bearing asset in the economy, as well as for adoption decisions regarding alternative financiai technologies.