Private or public? a taxonomy of optimal ownership and management regimes

We develop a theory of public versus private ownership based on value diversion by managers. Government is assumed to face stronger institutional constraints than has been assumed in previous literature. The model which emerges from these assumptions is fexible and has wide application. We provide amapping between the qualitative characteristics of an asset, its main use - including public goods characteristics, and spillovers toother assets values - and the optimal ownership and management regime. The model is applied to single and multiple related assets. We address questions such as; when is it optimal to have one of a pair ofr elated assets public and the other private; when is joint management desirable; and when should a public asset be managed by the owner of a related private asset? We show that while private ownership can be judged optimal in some cases solely on the basis of qualitative information, the optimality of any other ownership and management regimes relies on quantitative analysis. Our results reveal the situations in which policy makers will have difficulty in determining the opimal regime.

The gay subject in business and its discursive formation: an exploration on power, knowledge and sexuality

Issues related to the reality of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) individuals are being incorporated into institutional and social discourses, and show the challenges that must be overcome towards citizenship. The inclusion of gay rights in the domain of institutions like the United Nations and the Brazilian Secretariat of Human Rights are a response to broader movements that places the gay subject as an important topic of debate in the social-political sphere. In this scenario, some institutions deserve close attention from researchers related to gay issues, the business environment being a good example. In this domain, diversity has become an important topic of debate between scholars, where the question of sexual identity in most cases does not appear. The literature that actually focuses on the theme is explored through approaches that are not able to break with universalisms and a normatized vocabulary. Therefore, this research explores discursive structures related to sexuality and examines the meanings construed throughout these structures as described by gay individuals working in business. Furthermore, it investigates patterns of discursive normative structures and consequential challenges faced by gay people in the working environment, and also complements the current debate both in the socio-political sphere and in academic reality on LGBT challenges. The Foucauldian notions of discourse, knowledge and power, and the main concepts of queer theory are incorporated to the analysis, as well as concepts related to the politics of post-colonial sexuality, subordination, and hegemonic forces, together with role of reflexivity in modernity and its impacts on secularized mental structures. The research design takes a phenomenological approach and bases its knowledge claim on a participatory perspective, where the sample chosen for data collection consisted of gay individuals working in the business environment, aiming at generate categories of meanings through the description of their experiences.

Impactos da adoção das novas tecnologias BPM (business process management) nos processos governamentais

Este relatório consolida os trabalhos de pesquisa, desenvolvidos entre abril de 2005 e abril de 2006, sobre o estado de adoção e oportunidades para uso de novas tecnologias de informação em processos de governo. A ampliação de fronteiras, para além dos limites tradicionais das organizações, traz uma nova e mais forte demanda por flexibilidade que possibilite o tratamento integrado de organismos de diferentes constituições, arquiteturas e processos operacionais, sem falar nos diferentes sistemas de informações. Isto é ainda mais importante nas organizações públicas. Por outro lado, uma das principais características negativas dos órgãos públicos é a morosidade e a burocracia nos processos administrativos e de atendimento ao cidadão. A falta de uma visão tecnológica moderna, isto é, a falta de um Plano Diretor de Tecnologia da Informação (PDTI) voltada para novas soluções, como é o caso do BPM, alinhada à falta de integração entre os sistemas e processos, faz com que muitos órgãos governamentais estejam caminhando na contramão do desenvolvimento tecnológico. Este projeto de pesquisa reveste-se, portanto, de alto interesse, pois focaliza as possibilidades e impactos da adoção das novas tecnologias orientadas a processos e web services (BPM - Business Process Management e BPMS - Business Process Management Systems) na área governamental, bastante desprovida de soluções integradas de serviços aos cidadãos e empresas. Estas novas tecnologias trazem paradigmas completamente diferentes dos até aqui adotados na implementação de sistemas de informações e automação de processos. Apesar das dificuldades inerentes ao tratamento de um tema complexo e novo, mais ainda em organismos governamentais, acreditamos ter desenvolvido um trabalho bastante aprofundado, atendendo aos objetivos estabelecidos no plano original, com os necessários acertos de rota e foco dos trabalhos. Cremos, também, que este trabalho estabelece uma referência relevante no conhecimento relacionados à melhoria de processos de governo, com base em novas tecnologias. Como sub-produtos planejados e realizados, inseridos no caderno de anexos a este relatório, estão conteúdos já desenvolvidos para a edição um ou dois livros sobre o tema, diversos artigos produzidos, além de diversos eventos realizados na EAESP, envolvendo o tema do projeto, que proporcionaram a oportunidade de excelentes trocas de experiências. Este relatório, apresentado de forma objetiva e sintética, focalizando somente os principais aspectos tratados, é complementado por um extenso conteúdo complementar, entregue em um caderno de Anexos.

Growth process in business and social entrepreneurship: the case of Brazil

The purpose of the dissertation is to investigate in depth the difference between the challenges social and business entrepreneurs face in the growth phase of their business in the particular environment of Brazil. This objective has been achieved through a two-steps methodology. The first step is a set of in-depth interviews carried out with industry experts such as professors, venture capitalists, consultants, fund managers or people involved in the support of growing startups (i.e. accelerators). These interviews allowed, first, to build a general perspective on the environment entrepreneurs operate into and to identify a list of challenges entrepreneurs face in the growth process of their business. This list was completed with the additional challenges identified in the previous literature. The second step of the methodology was to test the relevance of these challenges in the mind and experience of social and traditional entrepreneurs. A questionnaire was then submitted to 145 social and 286 traditional entrepreneurs. The results were statistically analyzed to test the relative relevance of these challenges for one group of entrepreneurs with respect to the other. The outcome of the analysis was significant. The most relevant challenges identified were, for both groups, taxation, bureaucracy, finding the right employees, creating effective teams, measuring firm performance and social value creation and obtaining funds. On the other side motivation, innovation, competition and lack of market space for growth represented the least relevant issues in the minds of entrepreneurs. This rank however did not differ significantly from social to traditional entrepreneurs. This testifies that in Brazil social and traditional entrepreneurs face the same set of challenges despite the widespread belief of the opposite.