O posicionamento dos tribunais perante os contratos de distribuição (1980-1999)

Esta pesquisa tem por objeto a análise sistemática da jurisprudência brasileira sobre os contratos de distribuição entre os anos de 1.980 e 2.000, procurando identificar qual a posição dos nossos Tribunais face a esses contratos. Nessa linha, constatou-se que os casos (acórdãos) abrem-se em cinco grandes blocos, quais sejam: (1) atribuição/divisão territorial; (2) questões possessórias; (3) renovatória de locação; (4) rescisão dos contratos de distribuição. Este grupo divide-se (i) naqueles contratos sujeitos à Lei Ferrari, (ii) naqueles referentes ao setor de combustíveis e derivados e (iii) naqueles não subsumíveis a tal diploma; (5) questões processuais relevantes, dividido em (i) litisconsórcio necessário e (ii) título executivo extrajudicial. Além disso, por se tratar de uma avenca atípica na maioria dos casos, a pesquisa procurou extrair de cada um dos casos qual o conceito de contrato de distribuição adotado.

Medindo valor em comunidades de prática: caso multicurso

Communities of Practice are groups of people who share a concern, problem or passion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise by interacting regularly. It¿s use as a tool for planning and implementation of programs for continuous training of teachers in Brazil is not widespread, but used occasionally. This dissertation seeks to demonstrate the use of the communities of practice theory in continuous teachers training in the Brazilian reality. It presents some models of continuous formation currently in process in Brazil, points to the principles of knowledge management taken by this work, presents the communities of practice theory and the criticism of this in its theoretical part. For the case study was used the methodology described by Robert Yin (2005) of single case study to examine the Multicurso, program to continuously train math teachers in the state of Goiás, Brazil. The community of practice formed in this program was examined on its form, as to the cultivation of communities of practice, as to the development and about the challenges of geographical distribution. Going beyond, this work has as its main objective to propose a methodology for measuring the value of communities of practice from the case studied, without the intention to make generalizations about the measurement of value in projects of various kinds. The model proposed indicators separated into two categories, the outcome and impact, to facilitate the measurement of value and prevent that communities of practice are to be criticized or super estimated by assignment of value to those without the unequivocal proof of unique causality at the same time it searchs to attest that the contribution of communities of practice in improvements in the systems in which the CoP are in.

Two heads may not be better than one : corporate board structure, managerial self-dealing,and common agency

This paper compares the effects on corporate performance and managerial self-dealing in a situation in which the CEO reports to a single Board that is responsible for both monitoring management and establishing performance targets to an alternative in which the CEO reports to two Boards, each responsible for a different task. The equilibrium set of the common agency game induced by the dual board structure is fully characterized. Compared to a single board, a dual board demands less aggressive performance targets from the CEO, but exerts more monitoring. A consequence of the first feature is that the CEO always exerts less effort toward production with a dual board. The effect of a dual board on CEO self-dealing is ambiguous: there are equilibria in which, in spite of the higher monitoring, self-dealing is higher in a dual system. The model indicates that the strategic interdependence generated by the assignment of different tasks to different boards may yield results that are far from the desired ones.

Generalists versus specialists in organizations

In this paper, we discuss the trade-o¤ between specialization and coordination in an organizational design problem. Most papers on the assignment of heterogeneous managers to di¤erent hierarchic levels emphasize the role of talent: better managers should be on top of hierarchies. However, this requires talent to be measured on an one-dimensional scale. In this paper, we explore the implications of allowing talent to have two dimensions: breadth and depth. Specialists have deep knowledge of few areas while generalists have narrow knowledge of many areas. When perfect communication is impossible, hierarchies arise in which generalists are at the top and specialists are at the bottom. We propose a model of imperfect communication and discuss its implications for organizational design, the optimal degree of centralization and the depth of hierarchies. We show that our model also implies plausible organizational structures, like balanced hierarchies and pyramidal structures.

Alternativas para constituição de garantia sobre direitos de crédito em favor de credores estrangeiros em operações de project finance de plataformas e sondas de perfuração

O presente trabalho tem como escopo analisar a estrutura de contratação de plataformas de produção e sondas de perfuração e as formas por meio das quais se pode garantir o direito dos financiadores aos créditos decorrentes do afretamento desses equipamentos. A estrutura de sua contratação geralmente ocorre por meio da celebração de contratos coligados de afretamento, com sociedade de propósito específico estrangeira (SPE), de prestação de serviços, com empresa vinculada constituída no Brasil. O financiamento, por sua vez, estrutura-se como um project finance internacional, em que a SPE toma financiamento junto a bancos estrangeiros, para pagamento da construção. Os direitos de crédito resultantes do afretamento servem como meio de pagamento do financiamento. Este trabalho analisa as principais características dos quatro arranjos contratuais por meio do qual os financiadores poderiam garantir seu acesso aos créditos, analisando as principais justificativas para sua possível adoção e os principais riscos relacionados à sua celebração, especialmente em vista da possibilidade de que a SPE seja parte de processo de recuperação judicial no Brasil, em razão da insolvência de seus controladores, quando estes são brasileiros. As quatro estruturas analisadas são a cessão de créditos regida pelas regras do Código Civil (Lei nº 10.406/2002), cessão fiduciária de direitos creditórios, prevista no artigo 66-B da Lei nº 4.728/1965, penhor de direitos e contratos regidos por legislação estrangeira.