1 resultado para constitutional judge
em Digital Commons @ Winthrop University
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Archive of European Integration (28)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (25)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (15)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (8)
- Brock University, Canada (22)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (8)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (45)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (40)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (29)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Harvard University (16)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (4)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (11)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (34)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (6)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (3)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (9)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (4)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (28)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (8)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (16)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (25)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (4)
- Universidade do Minho (32)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (7)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (41)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (100)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (239)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (74)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
Resumo:
Direct legislation in the United States is a subject that has received a great deal of attention recently. A large proportion of this attention however has been focused on the potential for direct legislation to harm minority groups. An example of this negative potential can be seen in a group of ballot propositions that were presented to California voters in the 1990s. These initiatives can all be interpreted as targeting various minority groups in California. As California is the state which makes use of the ballot initiative more frequently than any other, this is a cause for concern. There are however several other factors that make it unclear whether direct legislation will more often lead to negative outcomes for minorities. There is also a noticeable effect of direct democracy generally on political participation. Several studies have found a positive correlation between the extent that a state uses ballot initiatives and referenda with political participation indexes such as voting rates. These findings complicate the negative attention that ballot initiatives have recently received.