1 resultado para Methodological discussions
em Digital Archives@Colby
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (21)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (84)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (3)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (80)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (32)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (16)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (6)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (11)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (20)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (110)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (8)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (3)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (85)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (20)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (12)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (62)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (44)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (59)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (45)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Even though assessing social marketing endeavors proves to be challenging, evaluators can learn from previous campaigns and identify which facets of social marketing events, programs and campaigns need to be improved. Additionally, by analyzing social movements and evaluating how they connect to social marketing, we can gain a clearer view on ways to ameliorate the field of social marketing. As social marketing becomes increasingly sophisticated and similar to commercial marketing, there is hope that social marketing can yield higher rates of success in the future. Friend and Levy (2002) claimed that it was nearly impossible to compare social marketing endeavors using quantitative criteria and advocate the use of qualitative methods. However, if social marketing scholars developed a more systematic paradigm to assess events, programs and campaigns employing a combination of both quantitative and qualitative methods, then it would be easier to establish which social marketing efforts generated more success than others. When there are too many confounding variables, conclusions cannot always be drawn and evaluations may not be viewed as legitimate. As a result, critics become skeptical of social marketing’s value and both the importance and credibility of social marketing decline. With the establishment of proper criteria and evaluation methods, social marketing can progress and initiate more social change.