1 resultado para Catholic League, 1609-1648.
em Digital Archives@Colby
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (7)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (5)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (29)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (32)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (3)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (40)
- Boston University Digital Common (7)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (19)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (6)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (11)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (9)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (14)
- Harvard University (14)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (20)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (26)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (23)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (36)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (133)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (377)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
The final question is: what happens in the meantime? Is it effective to dissent while conservatives hold power and clearty are not about to make any major changes? What good does it do to repeatedly bang one's head against the wall when progress is not being made? There is no one simple answer to this question, but rather several applicable ones. The first possible answer is that dissent currently does little good. The conservative hierarchy is still the dominant force within Catholicism. This hierarchy has made a habit, evidenced by the birth control debate, of pressing its conservative agenda despite popular opposition. Many people think, that if this hierarchy has not given in to the mass of opinion against it yet, dissent is futile and useless. Why argue with someone who does not listen to your argument?