17 resultados para goal-oriented requirements engineering
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (44)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (21)
- Boston University Digital Common (5)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (33)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (38)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (9)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (109)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (17)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (9)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (19)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (6)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (49)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (30)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (196)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Almería (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (16)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (4)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (61)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (16)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (8)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Michigan (10)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (32)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
During the development of system requirements, software system specifications are often inconsistent. Inconsistencies may arise for different reasons, for example, when multiple conflicting viewpoints are embodied in the specification, or when the specification itself is at a transient stage of evolution. These inconsistencies cannot always be resolved immediately. As a result, we argue that a formal framework for the analysis of evolving specifications should be able to tolerate inconsistency by allowing reasoning in the presence of inconsistency without trivialisation, and circumvent inconsistency by enabling impact analyses of potential changes to be carried out. This paper shows how clustered belief revision can help in this process. Clustered belief revision allows for the grouping of requirements with similar functionality into clusters and the assignment of priorities between them. By analysing the result of a cluster, an engineer can either choose to rectify problems in the specification or to postpone the changes until more information becomes available.