La transmission spirituelle

Vouloir parler de la transmission, revient en somme passer en revue l’histoire de l’homme à travers ses différentes évolutions. Les civilisations, les cultures, les visages, les coutumes sont en effet le résultat de transmissions successives qui se sont effectuées dans et à travers le temps.

Ce livre pose une question essentielle : Comment peut-on transmettre de la conscience à quelqu’un ? Car l’axe essentiel de toute spiritualité non dénaturée est de rendre conscient. A ce niveau, la transmission devrait se passer entre quelqu’un qui est conscient et quelqu’un qui se trouve en déficit de conscience. L’instructeur spirituel partage avec l’autre la clarté de conscience dans laquelle il se trouve afin de créer une ouverture et un supplément d’âme. C’est là ce qui distingue la transmission spirituelle de l’acte simple de transmettre un savoir ou des informations d’ordre culturel, technique ou autre de génération en génération. Dans le cadre de la transmission de conscience, le paradoxe est qu’il faut révéler à l’autre, lui transmettre un état d’être qui se trouve déjà en lui. C’est une thérapie de l’âme.

Hay critica de arquitectura en la red?

 Thanks to the powerful internet, voices that speak about architecture increase every day. This super-populated architectural Speaker’s Corner, is so noisy that it’s even difficult to listen what each speaker is saying. The possibility of saying has turned up to be more important than the relevance of what is actually said. It´s no longer important who says each thing. Our hope is that among all this shouting and screaming we’ll be able to extract something intelligible and able to construct a discourse for architecture. Is this the new format of architectural critic? Transparency is the fundamental value that rules over information transmission in the new digital universe. Transparency that intends to minimise all negativity. By definition it’s positive, operational, flat and sameness. It offers undoubtable advantages in terms of speed, accessibility and amount of information. However, theoretical knowledge must, also by definition, include negativity. And negativity slowens, blocks and limits. The goal of theoretical critic is to segregate, separate and differentiate. It searches a certain truth that is neither transparent nor positive. It must also operate and define what is false. Simple accumulation of information and communication doesn't search or achieve a true conclusion. This paper outlines a taxonomy of the different voices speaking about architecture in the internet. Even though these architectural nano-discourses declare explicitly that they don’t want to replace traditional critic, the role they play particularly in architecture education, is very similar. And their unequivocal search for transparency based on freedom of speech and information, pulls them away from the capacities of traditional critic, of course in terms of format, but also for reason of much deeper importance.