Spam filtering based on preference ranking

When the average number of spam messages received is continually increasing exponentially, both the Internet service provider and the end user suffer. The lack of an efficient solution may threaten the usability of the email as a communication means. In this paper we present a filtering mechanism applying the idea of preference ranking. This filtering mechanism will distinguish spam emails from other email on the Internet. The preference ranking gives the similarity values for nominated emails and spam emails specified by users, so that the ISP/end users can deal with spam emails at filtering points. We designed three filtering points to classify nominated emails into spam email, unsure email and legitimate email. This filtering mechanism can be applied on both middleware and at the client-side. The experiments show that high precision, recall and TCR (total cost ratio) of spam emails can be predicted for the preference based filtering mechanisms.

Synthetic evaluation method for bridge priority ranking

In order to maintain the transportation operation, proper monitoring systems should be established on road structures, especially bridges. Since these systems need enormous investments, only a part of bridges should be equipped. Thus, the priorities of the bridges should be ranked. In this paper, a method based on two-level synthetic evaluation is proposed. First, the importance of each bridge is analyzed through the economic analysis. Six factors are considered for the bridges in a network, including construction cost, service duration, length, location importance coefficient, traffic volume, and reconstruction time. Second, the safety condition of the bridge is evaluated by using improved entropy method (IEM) which combines subjective weight with objective entropy weight. Five indices are incorporated in this step, i.e., design and construction condition, technical condition, level of overloading, hazard of wind and earthquake and environmental factors. Finally, the priorities of all the bridge in one network can be ranked and classified through a judge matrix. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, a main highway including 16 bridges is taken as an illustrative example. The results show that the bridges can be ranked and classified quickly by using the proposed method.

Second-year pre-service teachers’ responses to proportional reasoning test items

A recent international study of pre-service teachers identified that proportional reasoning was problematic for pre-service teachers. Proportional reasoning is an important topic in the middle years of schooling and therefore it is critical that teachers understand this topic and can rely on their Mathematical Content Knowledge (MCK) when teaching. The focus of this paper is second-year Australian primary pre-service teachers’ MCK of real number items related to ratio, rate, proportion and proportional reasoning. This paper reports on strengths and weakness of pre-service teachers’ MCK when responding to test items; including a method suitable for analysing responses to five items and ranked by three levels of difficulty. The results revealed insights into their correct methods of solutions and common incorrect responses, identifying difficulty, where multiplication and division were required. The method of coding test items by difficulty ranking may assist with developing an appropriate learning trajectory, which will assist pre-service teachers develop their MCK of this and other difficult topics.

Service and cloud computing supporting genomic analysis of the mammalian species

 This research focused on building Software as a Service clouds to support mammalian genomic applications such as personalized medicine. Outcomes of this research included a Software as a Service cloud framework, the Uncinus research cloud and novel genomic analysis software. Results have been published in high ranking peer-reviewed international journals.

Discovering implicit criteria preferences reflected in tourism journal ranking lists using the Choquet Integral

Variations between journal rankings may cause confusion. As such, prior attempts were made to compare and evaluate journal ranking criteria for obtaining insightful knowledge on how different research communities have ranked journals. However, existing approaches are unable to model the journal ranking process closely enough as they are incapable of considering the relationship between multiple criteria simultaneously. In this paper, we address the challenges by introducing the Choquet Integral (CI) for evaluating journal ranking criteria. The new approach is able to account for interactions between criteria in relation to overall ranking score, using a fuzzy measure in its computation. Its properties, the Shapley value and the Interaction index, allow for good representations of importance and interactions between criteria. We demonstrate the efficiency of the CI through a case study of journal ranking lists in tourism and service journals.