Cyclic carbonate–sodium smectite intercalates

Five-membered cyclic organic carbonates (COC) are of interest for their ability to modify the surface properties of smectites and enhance the hydraulic resistance of bentonites to saline leachates. The mechanism of interaction of glycerol carbonate (GC) and several other hydroxyl containing cyclic organic carbonates (generally having progressively greater molecular masses) with sodium montmorillonite (Na+-Mt) was studied using powder X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy. The 001 reflection for GC/Na+-Mt intercalates varied with the amount COC added, and the measured d001 value increased from 1.29 nm to as large as 2.22 nm at equal-mass coverage of the COC to Na+-Mt. In general, when intercalated, the cyclic carbonyl (Cdouble bond; length as m-dashO) stretch and the fundamental hydroxyl (O–H) stretch bands of COC derivatives were red-shifted with respect to these bands for neat COC, indicating strong ion-dipole interaction of the carbonyl group with interlayer Na+, and H-bonding of the OH group with both interlayer water and Mt surfaces. A stable and highly ordered intercalate was produced at a 1:1 mass loading with Mt in which about 6 GC molecules per unit cell (~ 7 molecules per Na+ ion) replaced most of the interlayer water.

Electrostatic complex of didodecyldimethylammonium and DNA: Langmuir monolayer, Langmuir–Blodgett film and dye recognition at air/water interface

DNA–didodecyldimethylammonium (DNA–DDDA) electrostatic complex was prepared and characterized through Fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR), 1H NMR and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. When the dye molecule aqueous solutions were used as the subphase, the interaction between three dye molecules, acridine orange (AO), ethidium bromide (EB) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-N-methylpyridyl)porphine tetra(p-toluenesulfonate) (TMPyP) and the complex at air/solution interface were investigated through the surface pressure–area (π–A) isotherms, Brewster angle microscopy and UV-Vis spectroscopy, respectively. Our investigation indicates that the interaction capabilities of the three dyes to DNA–DDDA complex are different and present an order of TMPyP>AO>EB. For the interaction forms, we believe that TMPyP intercalates into the double helix of DNA, and AO adsorbs onto the surface of the DNA. As for EB, the measured signal is too weak to give a definite interaction form in the present experiment.