A new method to warm up lubricating oil to improve the fuel efficiency during cold start

Cold start driving cycles exhibit an increase in friction losses due to the low temperatures of metal and media compared to normal operating engine conditions. These friction losses are responsible for up to 10% penalty in fuel economy over the official drive cycles like the New European Drive Cycle (NEDC), where the temperature of the oil even at the end of the 1180 s of the drive cycle is below the fully warmed up values of between 100°C and 120°C. At engine oil temperatures below 100°C the water from the blow by condensates and dilutes the engine oil in the oil pan which negatively affects engine wear. Therefore engine oil temperatures above 100°C are desirable to minimize engine wear through blow by condensate. The paper presents a new technique to warm up the engine oil that significantly reduces the friction losses and therefore also reduces the fuel economy penalty during a 22°C cold start NEDC. Chassis dynamometer experiments demonstrated fuel economy improvements of over 7% as well as significant emission reductions by rapidly increasing the oil temperature. Oil temperatures were increased by up to 60°C during certain parts of the NEDC. It is shown how a very simple sensitivity analysis can be used to assess the relative size or efficiency of different heat transfer passes and the resulting fuel economy improvement potential of different heat recovery systems system. Due to its simplicity the method is very fast to use and therefore also very cost effective. The method demonstrated a very good correlation for the fuel consumption within ±1% compared to measurements on a vehicle chassis roll.

Economic growth with coal, oil and renewable energy consumption in China: prospects for fuel substitution

We examine the relationship between Chinese aggregate production and consumption of three main energy commodities: coal, oil and renewable energy. Both autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) and vector error correction modeling (VECM) show that Chinese growth is led by all three energy sources. Economic growth also causes coal, oil and renewables consumption, but with negative own-price effects for coal and oil and a strong possibility of fuel substitution through positive cross-price effects. The results further show coal consumption causing pollution, while renewable energy consumption reduces emissions. No significant causation on emissions is found for oil. Hence, making coal both absolutely and relatively expensive compared to oil and renewable energy encourages shifting from coal to oil and renewable energy, thereby improving economic and environmental sustainability.

Characterising vehicle emissions from the burning of biodiesel made from vegetable oil

Biodiesel manufactured from canola oil was blended with diesel and used as fuel in two diesel vehicles. This study aimed to test the emissions of diesel engines using blends of 100%, 80%, 60%, 40% , 20% biodiesel and 100% petroleum diesel, and characterise the particulate matter and gaseous emissions, with particular attention to levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) which are harmful to humans. A real time dust monitor was also used to monitor the continuous dust emissions during the entire testing cycle. The ECE(Euro 2) drive cycle was used for all emission tests. It was found that the particle concentration was up to 33% less when the engine burnt 100% biodiesel, compared to 100% diesel. Particle emission reduced with increased percentages of biodiesel in the fuel blends. Reductions of NOx, HC and CO were limited to about 10% when biodiesel was burned. Levels of CO2 emissions from the use of biodiesel and diesel were similar. Eighteen EPA priority PAHs were targeted, with only 6 species detected in the gaseous phase from the samples . 9 PAHs were detected in particulate phases at much lower levels than gaseous PAHs. Some marked reductions were observed for less toxic gaseous PAHs such as naphthalene when burning 100% biodiesel, but the particulate PAH emissions, which have more implications to adverse health effects, were virtually unchanged and did not show a statistically significant reduction. These findings are useful to gain an understanding of the emissions and environmental impacts of biodiesel.

Comparison of advanced waste heat recovery systems with a novel oil heating system

Latest trends in waste heat recovery include systems like Thermo Electric Generation (TEG), Rankine cycle, and active warm up systems. The advantages and disadvantages of different approaches are critically discussed and compared with a novel and effective oil heating system that can deliver between 7% and 12% reductions of CO2 emissions and fuel consumption. The comparison includes the expected CO2 and fuel saving potential related to the legal drive cycle as well as real world driving, effects on regulated exhaust emissions, utilisation of resources, maintenance and service, vehicle performance, comfort, noise, and durability.

A novel exhaust heat recovery system to reduce fuel consumption

Internal combustion engines release about 1/3 of the energy bound in the fuel as exhaust waste gas energy and another 1/3 energy is wasted through heat transfer into the ambient. On the other hand losses through friction are the third largest root cause for energy loss in internal combustion engines. During city driving frictional losses can be of the same size as the effective work, and during cold start these losses are even bigger. Therefore it is obvious to utilise wasted exhaust energy to warm up the engine oil directly. Frictional losses of any engine can be reduced during part load. Sensitivity analyses have been conducted for different concepts that utilise exhaust energy to reduce engine viscosity and friction. For a new system with an exhaust gas/oil heat exchanger the following benefits have been demonstrated:

• Fuel consumption reductions of over 7% measured as an average over 5 NEDC tests
compared to the standard system configuration.
• Significant reductions in exhaust emissions, mainly CO and NOx have been achieved
• Significantly higher oil temperatures during cold start indicate large potential to
reduce engine wear through reduced water condensation in the crankcase
• Fuel consumption reductions of further 3.3% to 4.6% compared to the 7% measured
over the NEDC test can be expected under real world customer usage conditions at
lower ambient temperatures.

Oil temperature measurements and analysis resulted in the idea of a novel system with further potential to reduce fuel consumption. This Oil Viscosity Energy Recovery System (OVER 7™) consists of 3 key features that add significant synergies if combined in a certain way: an oil warm up circuit/bypass, including oil pressure control and Exhaust Gas/Oil Heat Exchanger. The system separates the thermal inertias of the oil in the engine galleries and the oil pan, reduces hydraulic pumping losses, increases the heat transfer from the cylinder head to the oil, and utilises the exhaust heat to reduce oil friction.

The project demonstrated that sensitivity analysis is an important tool for the evaluation of different concepts. Especially for new concepts that include transient heat transfer such a qualitative approach in combination with accurate experiments and measurements can be faster and more efficient in leading to the desired improvements compared to time consuming detailed simulations.

Comparison of advanced waste heat recovery systems with a novel oil heating system

Latest trends in waste heat recovery include systems like Thermo Electric Generation (TEG), Rankine cycle, and active warm up systems. The advantages and disadvantages of different approaches are critically discussed and compared with a novel and effective oil heating system that can deliver between 7% and 12% reductions of CO2 emissions and fuel consumption. The comparison includes the expected CO2 and fuel saving potential related to the legal drive cycle as well as real world driving, effects on regulated exhaust emissions, utilisation of resources, maintenance and service, vehicle performance, comfort, noise, and durability.

Fuel consumption- and emission analysis of exhaust heat recovery systems

The study examined waste heat recovery systems for combustion engines. Emission tests with a real vehicle showed that fuel consumption and CO2 emissions can be reduced by over 7% for the official certification drive cycle through direct heat transfer from the exhaust gas to the engine oil.

The effect of triacetin as a fuel additive to waste cooking biodiesel on engine performance and exhaust emissions

This study investigates the effect of oxygenated fuels on engine performance and exhaust emission under a custom cycle using a fully instrumented 6-cylinder turbocharged diesel engine with a common railinjection system. A range of oxygenated fuels based on waste cooking biodiesel with triacetin as an oxygenated additive were studied. The oxygen ratio was used instead of the equivalence ratio, or air to fuelratio, to better explain the phenomena observed during combustion. It was found that the increased oxygen ratio was associated with an increase in the friction mean effective pressure, brake specific fuel consumption, CO, HC and PN. On the other hand, mechanical efficiency, brake thermal efficiency, CO2, NOx and PM decreased with oxygen ratio. Increasing the oxygen content of the fuel was associated with a decrease in indicated power, brake power, indicated mean effective pressure, brake mean effective pressure, friction power, blow-by, CO2, CO (at higher loads), HC, PM and PN. On the other hand, the brakespecific fuel consumption, brake thermal efficiency and NOx increased by using the oxygenated fuels. Also, by increasing the oxygen content, the accumulation mode count median diameter moved toward the smaller particle sizes. In addition to the oxygen content of fuel, the other physical and chemical properties of the fuels were used to interpret the behavior of the engine.