Effect of synthesis parameters on the electrical conductivity of polypyrrole-coated poly(ethylene terephthalate) fabrics

The effects of pyrrole, anthraquinone-2-sulphonic acid (AQSA) and iron(III) chloride (FeCl3) concentrations, reaction time and temperature on the electrical conductivity of polypyrrole (PPy) - coated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) fabrics were investigated. With an increase in both the AQSA and FeCl3 concentrations, resistivity decreased to a point beyond which higher concentrations led to increased surface resistivity. Erosion of the polymer coating, in dynamic synthesis from continual abrasion, manifested as an exponential increase in the resistance of the coated textile substrate. This was not encountered in static synthesis conditions. Temperature affected the degree of surface and bulk polymerisation. The effect of polymerisation temperature on conductivity was negligible. Conductive polymer coating on textiles through chemical polymerisation enabled a smooth coherent film to encase individual fibres, which did not affect the tactile properties of the host substrate. The optimum FeCl3/pyrrole and AQSA FeCl3/pyrrole molar ratios were found to be 2.22 and 0.40 respectively.

Phase behavior and crystallization in blends of a low molecular weight polyethylene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer and poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A)

The phase behavior, morphology and crystallization in blends of a low-molecular-weight (Mn = 1400) double-crystalline polyethylene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (PE-PEO) diblock copolymer with poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A) (PH) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, transmission electron microscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering. The symmetric PE-PEO diblock copolymer consists of a PH-miscible PEO block and a PH-immiscible PE block. However, PH only exhibits partial miscibility with the PEO block of the copolymer in the PH/PE-PEO blends; both macrophase and microphase separations took place. There existed two macrophases in the PH/PE-PEO blends, i.e., a PH-rich phase and a PE-PEO copolymer-rich phase. The PE block of the copolymer in the blends exhibited fractionated crystallization behavior by homogeneous nucleation. There appeared three crystallization exotherms related to the crystallization of the PE block within three different microenvironments in the PH/PE-PEO blends.

Miscibility, crystallization κinetics and real-time small-Angle x-ray scattering investigation of the semicrystalline morphology in thermosetting polymer blends of epoxy resin and poly(ethylene oxide)

Thermosetting polymer blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and bisphenol-A-type epoxy resin (ER) were prepared using 4,4′-methylenebis(3-chloro-2,6-diethylaniline) (MCDEA) as curing agent. The miscibility and crystallization behavior of MCDEA-cured ER/PEO blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The existence of a single composition-dependent glass transition temperature (Tg) indicates that PEO is completely miscible with MCDEA-cured ER in the melt and in the amorphous state over the entire composition range. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) investigations indicated hydrogen-bonding interaction between the hydroxyl groups of MCDEA-cured ER and the ether oxygens of PEO in the blends, which is an important driving force for the miscibility of the blends. The average strength of the hydrogen bond in the cured ER/PEO blends is higher than in the pure MCDEA-cured ER. Crystallization kinetics of PEO from the melt is strongly influenced by the blend composition and the crystallization temperature. At high conversion, the time dependence of the relative degree of crystallinity deviated from the Avrami equation. The addition of a non-crystallizable ER component into PEO causes a depression of both the overall crystallization rate and the melting temperature. The surface free energy of folding σe displays a minimum with variation of composition. The spherulitic morphology of PEO in the ER/PEO blends exhibits typical characteristics of miscible crystalline/amorphous blends, and the PEO spherulites in the blends are always completely volume-filling. Real-time small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments reveal that the long period L increases drastically with increasing ER content at the same temperatures. The amorphous cured ER component segregates interlamellarly during the crystallization process of PEO because of the low chain mobility of the cured ER. A model describing the semicrystalline morphology of MCDEA-cured ER/PEO blends is proposed based on the SAXS results. The semicrystalline morphology is a stack of crystalline lamellae; the amorphous fraction of PEO, the branched ER chains and imperfect ER network are located between PEO lamellae.

Phase behavior, crystallization, and hierarchical nanostructures in self-organized thermoset blends of epoxy resin and amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymers

Nanostructured thermoset blends of bisphenol A-type epoxy resin (ER) and amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) triblock copolymers were successfully prepared. Two samples of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer with different ethylene oxide (EO) contents, denoted as EO30 with 30 wt % EO content and EO80 with 80 wt % EO content, were used to form the self-organized thermoset blends of varying compositions using 4,4'-methylenedianiline (MDA) as curing agent. The phase behavior, crystallization, and morphology were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). It was found that macroscopic phase separation took place in the MDA-cured ER/EO30 blends containing 60-80 wt % EO30 triblock copolymer. The MDA-cured ER/EO30 blends with EO30 content up to 50 wt % do not show macroscopic phase separation but exhibit nanostructures on the order of 10-30 nm as revealed by both the TEM and SAXS studies. The AFM study further shows that the ER/EO30 blend at some composition displays structural inhomogeneity at two different nanoscales and is hierarchically nanostructured. The spherical PPO domains with an average size of about 10 nm are uniformly dispersed in the 80/20 ER/EO30 blend; meanwhile, a structural inhomogeneity on the order of 50-200 nm is observed. The ER/EO80 blends are not macroscopically phase-separated over the entire composition range because of the much higher PEO content of the EO80 triblock copolymer. However, the ER/EO80 blends show composition-dependent nanostructures on the order of 10-100 nm. The 80/20 ER/EO80 blend displays hierarchical structures at two different nanoscales, i.e., a bicontinuous microphase structure on the order of about 100 nm and spherical domains of 10-20 nm in diameter uniformly dispersed in both the continuous microphases. The blends with 60 wt % and higher EO80 content are completely volume-filled with spherulites. Bundles of PEO lamellae with spacing of 20-30 nm interwoven with a microphase structure on the order of about 100 nm are revealed by AFM study for the 30/70 ER/EO80 blend.

Synthesis and fractionated crystallization of organic-inorganic hybrid composite materials from an amphiphilic polyethylene-block-poly (ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer

Mesostructurally ordered inorganic–organic hybrid composite materials were successfully synthesized by utilizing a low-molecular-weight amphiphilic polyethylene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (PE–PEO) diblock copolymer as the directing agent. The hybrid composites were formed via the sol–gel reaction of inorganic precursor tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) in an acidic ethanol/water solution with various amounts of PE–PEO. In these composite materials, the hydrophobic PE block of the PE–PEO copolymer forms separate microphase on the nanoscales within the rigid matrix of silica network. The crystallization of the PE block is strictly restricted within the microphase by the rigid silica matrix and takes place through homogeneous nucleation under the nanoscale confinement environment.

Preparation of cross-linked nanoporous poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate membrane in hexagonal lyotropic liquid crystal phases

Cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) membranes were prepared by polymerization in periodic nanostructured lyotropic liquid crystals (LLC) hexagonal phases under UV light. A series of membranes were prepared under different purification treatment conditions. Polarized light microscope was employed to determine the LLC phase texture of LLC system before and after polymerization. It is found that the LLC hexagonal structure retained to some degree after polymerization. The interior structures of final membranes were investigated with scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results suggested that purification process affect the structure retention.

Microphase separation in double crystalline poly (ethylene oxide)-block-poly (caprolactone)/poly (4-vinyl phenol) blends

We report microphase separation induced by competitive hydrogen bonding interactions in double crystalline diblock copolymer/homopolymer blends of poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PEO-b-PCL) and poly(4-vinyl phenol) (PVPh). The diblock copolymer PEO-b-PCL consists of two immiscible crystallizable blocks wherein both PEO and PCL blocks can form hydrogen bonds with PVPh. In these A-b-B/C diblock copolymer/homopolymer blends, microphase separation takes place due to the disparity in intermolecular interactions; specifically PVPh and PEO block interact strongly whereas PVPh and PCL block interact weakly. The TEM and SAXS results show that the cubic PEO-b-PCL diblock copolymer changes into ordered hexagonal cylindrical morphology upon addition of 20 wt % PVPh followed by disordered bicontinuous phase in the blend with 40 wt % PVPh and then to homogenous phase at 60 wt% PVPh and above. Up to 40 wt % PVPh there is only weak interaction between PVPh and PCL due to the selective hydrogen bonding between PVPh and PEO. However, with higher PVPh concentration, the blends become homogeneous since a sufficient amount of PVPh is available to form hydrogen bonds with both PEO and PCL. A structural model was proposed to explain the self-assembly and morphology of these blends based on the experimental results obtained. The formation of nanostructures and changes in morphologies depend on the relative strength of hydrogen bonding interaction between each block of the block copolymer and the homopolymer (1-3).

Structure retention in cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogel templated from a hexagonal lyotropic liquid crystal by controlling the surface tension

Retaining hexagonal lyotropic liquid crystal (LLC) structures in polymers after surfactant removal and drying is particularly challenging, as the surface tension existing during the drying processes tends to change the morphology. In this study, cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogels were prepared in LLC hexagonal phases formed from a dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB)/water system. The retention of the hexagonal LLC structures was examined by controlling the surface tension. Polarized light microscopy, X-ray diffraction and small angle X-ray scattering results indicate that the hexagonal LLC structure was successfully formed before polymerization and well retained after polymerization and after surfactant removal when the surface tension forces remained neutral. Controlling the surface tension during the drying process can retain the nanostructures templated from lyotropic liquid crystals which will result in the formation of materials with desired nanostructures.

Hybrid hierarchical patterns of gold nanoparticles and poly(ethylene glycol) microstructures

Hybrid surface micro-patterns composed of topographic structures of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-hydrogels and hierarchical lines of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) were fabricated on silicon wafers. Micro-sized lines of Au NPs were first obtained on the surface of a silicon wafer via “micro-contact deprinting”, a method recently developed by our group. Topographic micro-patterns of PEG, of both low and high aspect ratio (AR up to 6), were then aligned on the pre-patterned surface via a procedure adapted from the soft lithographic method MIMIC (Micro-Molding in Capillaries), which is denoted as “adhesive embossing”. The result is a complex surface pattern consisting of alternating flat Au NP lines and thick PEG bars. Such patterns provide novel model surfaces for elucidating the interplay between (bio)chemical and physical cues on cell behavior.