Use of calcium or calcuim in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis

Background:  Whether calcium supplementation can reduce osteoporotic fractures is uncertain. We did a meta-analysis to include all the randomised trials in which calcium, or calcium in combination with vitamin D, was used to prevent fracture and osteoporotic bone loss.

Methods:  We identified 29 randomised trials (n=63 897) using electronic databases, supplemented by a hand-search of reference lists, review articles, and conference abstracts. All randomised trials that recruited people aged 50 years or older were eligible. The main outcomes were fractures of all types and percentage change of bone-mineral density from baseline. Data were pooled by use of a random-effect model.

Findings:  In trials that reported fracture as an outcome (17 trials, n=52 625), treatment was associated with a 12% risk reduction in fractures of all types (risk ratio 0·88, 95% CI 0·83–0·95; p=0·0004). In trials that reported bone-mineral density as an outcome (23 trials, n=41 419), the treatment was associated with a reduced rate of bone loss of 0·54% (0·35–0·73; p<0·0001) at the hip and 1·19% (0·76–1·61%; p<0·0001) in the spine. The fracture risk reduction was significantly greater (24%) in trials in which the compliance rate was high (p<0·0001). The treatment effect was better with calcium doses of 1200 mg or more than with doses less than 1200 mg (0·80 vs 0·94; p=0·006), and with vitamin D doses of 800 IU or more than with doses less than 800 IU (0·84 vs 0·87; p=0·03).

Interpretation:  Evidence supports the use of calcium, or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation, in the preventive treatment of osteoporosis in people aged 50 years or older. For best therapeutic effect, we recommend minimum doses of 1200 mg of calcium, and 800 IU of vitamin D (for combined calcium plus vitamin D supplementation).

The evidence that exercise during growth or adulthood reduces the risk of fragility fractures is weak

There has never been, and will never be, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrating that exercise in youth, adulthood or old age reduces fragility or osteoporosis-related fractures in old age. The next level of evidence, a randomized, controlled but unblinded study with fractures as an end-point is feasible but has never been done. The basis for the belief that exercise reduces fractures is derived from lower levels of ‘evidence’, namely, retrospective and prospective observation cohort studies and case–control studies. These studies are at best hypothesis generating, never hypothesis testing. They are all subject to many systematic biases and should be interpreted with extreme scepticism. Surrogate measures of anti-fracture efficacy are the next level of evidence, such as the demonstration of a reduction in risk factors for falls, a reduction in falls, a reduction in fractures due to falls, an increase in peak bone size and mass, prevention of bone loss in midlife and restoration of bone mass and structure in old age.

Ice and pulsed electromagnetic field to reduce pain and swelling after distal radius fractures

Objective: To examine the relative effectiveness of ice therapy and/or pulsed electromagnetic field in reducing pain and swelling after the immobilization period following a distal radius fracture.Methods: A total of 83 subjects were randomly allocated to receive 30 minutes of either ice plus pulsed electromagnetic field (group A); ice plus sham pulsed electromagnetic field (group B); pulsed electromagnetic field alone (group C), or sham pulsed electromagnetic field treatment for 5 consecutive days (group D). All subjects received a standard home exercise programme. A visual analogue scale was used for recording pain; volumetric displacement for measuring the swelling of the forearm; and a hand-held goniometer for measuring the range of wrist motions before treatment on days 1, 3 and 5.Results: At day 5, a significantly greater cumulative reduction in the visual analogue scores as well as ulnar deviation range of motion was found in group A than the other 3 groups. For volumetric measurement and pronation, participants in group A performed better than subjects in group D but not those in group B.Conclusion: The addition of pulsed electromagnetic field to ice therapy produces better overall treatment outcomes than ice alone, or pulsed electromagnetic field alone in pain reduction and range of joint motion in ulnar deviation and flexion for a distal radius fracture after an immobilization period of 6 weeks.

Overweight children have poor bone strength relative to body weight, placing them at greater risk for forearm fractures

Introduction: Obesity is thought to be a protective factor for bones in adults but not in children based on the evidence of the greater incidence of forearm fractures in obese children. Our objective was to investigate the effect of adiposity on bone strength in relation to the mechanical challenge placed onto the forearm bones in case of a fall.

Methods: Cross sectional areas (CSA) were obtained at the mid- and distal radius by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in 486 children (241 boys), mean age 8.3 years (range 6.9–9.7), participating in the LOOK Project. The following parameters were measured: bone mass and bone CSA (both sites), and muscle and fat CSA (mid-forearm only). Bone strength indices combining bone size and total volumetric density were calculated at each site.

Results/Discussion: Overweight children (BMI > percentile equivalent to 25 kg/m² in adults) have higher bone parameters than normal-weight peers (Z-scores +0.6 to +0.9SD, p < 0.0001). These differences disappear after adjustment for muscle CSA. Adiposity (fat CSA/muscle CSA) was negatively correlated with bone mass, size and strength at the distal radius only (r = −0.1, p < 0.05). After adjustment for body weight (estimate of the load during a fall), the negative correlations were stronger and observed at both the mid- and distal radius (r = −0.37 to −0.55, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion. Overweight children have stronger bones due to greater muscle size. However, children with high fat mass relative to muscle mass (increased adiposity) have poorer bone strength, independent of weight, which may contribute to the increased risk of fracture in obese children.

Efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a randomised controlled trial [ACTRN012605000079640]

Background: Vertebroplasty is a promising but as yet unproven treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. It involves radiographic-guided injection of various types of bone cement directly into the vertebral fracture site. Uncontrolled studies and two controlled quasi-experimental before-after studies comparing volunteers who were offered treatment to those who refused it, have suggested an early benefit including rapid pain relief and improved function. Conversely, several uncontrolled studies and one of the controlled before-after studies have also suggested that vertebroplasty may increase the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures, particularly in vertebrae adjacent to treated levels or if cement leakage into the adjacent disc has occurred. As yet, there are no completed randomised controlled trials of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The aims of this participant and outcome assessor-blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial are to i) determine the short-term efficacy and safety (3 months) of vertebroplasty for alleviating pain and improving function for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures; and ii) determine its medium to longer-term efficacy and safety, particularly the risk of further fracture over 2 years.

Design: A double-blind randomised controlled trial of 200 participants with one or two recent painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Participants will be stratified by duration of symptoms (< and ≥ 6 weeks), gender and treating radiologist and randomly allocated to either the treatment or placebo. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Outcome measures include overall, night and rest pain on 10 cm visual analogue scales, quality of life measured by the Assessment of Quality of Life, Osteoporosis Quality of Life and EQ-5D questionnaires; participant perceived recovery on a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 'a great deal worse' to 'a great deal better'; disability measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; timed 'Up and Go' test; and adverse effects. The presence of new fractures will be assessed by radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine performed at 12 and 24 months.

Discussion: The results of this trial will be of major international importance and findings will be immediately translatable into clinical practice.

Trial registration: Australian Clinical Trial Register # [ACTRN012605000079640]

A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Background Vertebroplasty has become a common treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but there is limited evidence to support its use.

Methods We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which participants with one or two painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures that were of less than 12 months' duration and unhealed, as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, were randomly assigned to undergo vertebroplasty or a sham procedure. Participants were stratified according to treatment center, sex, and duration of symptoms (<6 weeks or 6 weeks). Outcomes were assessed at 1 week and at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary outcome was overall pain (on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the maximum imaginable pain) at 3 months.

Results A total of 78 participants were enrolled, and 71 (35 of 38 in the vertebroplasty group and 36 of 40 in the placebo group) completed the 6-month follow-up (91%). Vertebroplasty did not result in a significant advantage in any measured outcome at any time point. There were significant reductions in overall pain in both study groups at each follow-up assessment. At 3 months, the mean (±SD) reductions in the score for pain in the vertebroplasty and control groups were 2.6±2.9 and 1.9±3.3, respectively (adjusted between-group difference, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, –0.7 to 1.8). Similar improvements were seen in both groups with respect to pain at night and at rest, physical functioning, quality of life, and perceived improvement. Seven incident vertebral fractures (three in the vertebroplasty group and four in the placebo group) occurred during the 6-month follow-up period.

Conclusions We found no beneficial effect of vertebroplasty as compared with a sham procedure in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures, at 1 week or at 1, 3, or 6 months after treatment. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN012605000079640.)

Efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures : a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Background: Vertebroplasty has become a common treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures despite limited evidence to support its use. The primary aim of this study was to determine its short-term efficacy and safety in this patient population.

Methods: In a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial, participants with one or two painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures < 12 months duration confirmed active by MRI were randomly assigned, stratified by center, gender and duration of symptoms (< or ≥ 6 weeks), to receive vertebroplasty or sham treatment. Primary outcome was overall pain (0–10 scale) at 3 months. Participants, investigators (other than the interventional radiologist) and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment assignment.

Results: 78 participants were enrolled and 73 (36/38 active, 37/40 placebo, 94%) completed 3-month follow up. Vertebroplasty did not show any statistically significant advantage in any measured outcome with 95% confidence intervals indicating no plausible practically important benefits of vertebroplasty over placebo. At 1 week, 1 and 3 months, there were significant improvements in overall pain in both treatment groups (mean improvement (SD): 1.5 (2.5), 2.1 (2.8), 2.3 (2.6), and 1.7 (3.3), 2.5 (2.9), 1.9 (3.4) in the active and placebo groups respectively). Similar improvements in both groups were observed for night and rest pain, function, quality of life and perceived improvement. Eight incident clinical vertebral fractures (3 active, 5 placebo) occurred during 3-month follow up.

Conclusion: We found no evidence of a beneficial effect of vertebroplasty over sham treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures, 1 week, 1 and 3 months following treatment. [Australian Clinical Trial Register number, ACTRN012605000079640]