Evaluating the performance of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands using natural zeolite (escott)

The objective of the present study was to assess the simultaneous removal of physiochemical parameters in moderate strength wastewater using a lab scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland (HFCW) with natural zeolite as a substrate. In this study, high-density polyethylene tanks (0.36 m²) were planted with phragmites australis and scirpus maritimus and received 0.012 m³/d to 0.08 m³/d of synthetic wastewater corresponding to a HLR of 0.035 to 0.243 m/d and a COD loading rate of 0.0148 kg COD (m².d)^-1 to 0.026 kg COD (m².d)^-1. The HFCW was subjected to three hydraulic retention times (HRT) for 4, 3 and 2 days respectively. Averaged data reported coincided with the plant age (4 to 55 weeks) and covered the entire cold season and early part of the hot season. Based on the 55 weeks of operation, the HFCW unit with zeolite achieved significantly higher removal for COD (85 to 88%), TN (54 to 96%), NH₄-N (50 to 99%) and TSS (91 to 96%) respectively at all HRT. This system was proved to be tolerant to high organic loadings and nutrients, suggesting these substrates as viable options for biological treatment of wastewater.

Evaluating the performance of different media in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland

The treatment efficiency of a wetland system requires a balance between pollutant loading rate and hydraulic retention time (HRT), hydraulic loading rate (HLR) and the suitable substrate to be used. The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment efficiency of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland planted with phragmites australis and scirpus maritimus containing three different substrates to treat agricultural wastewater under short term operation. Alum sludge and zeolite were used as substrates and gravel was used as a control for a laboratory-scale horizontal flow constructed wetland (CW) units that were made of high-density Polyethylene. The units were operated under 2, 3 and 4 days of HRTs and at different HLR for each substrate. Each beds received 0.012 m3/d to 0.08 m3/d of synthetic wastewater corresponding to a HLR of 0.035 to 0.243 m/d and a COD loading rate of 0.0148 kg COD (m2.d)-1 to 0.026 kg COD (m2.d)-1. The relationships between the substrate, retention time and removal efficiency, especially of organic matter and nutrient removal were investigated. All units showed relatively stable removal for COD during the entire operational period. The COD removal for all units and HRT were in ranged from 67% to 93%. The zeolite unit achieved significantly higher removal of TN, NH4-N and TSS compared to alum sludge and gravel unit at all HRT. The unit with zeolite was highly effective in removing TN (54 to 96%), NH4-N (50 to 99%) and TSS (91 to 96%) respectively, at 2, 3 and 4 days of HRT. Meanwhile, alum sludge was highly effective in removing phosphate. The removal of phosphate from alum sludge unit was ranged from 94 to 97% for all HRT. Compared to gravel CW unit, zeolite and alum sludge CW were proved to be tolerant to high organic loadings and nutrients, suggesting these substrates as viable options for biological treatment of agricultural wastewater.