Encouraging a culture of justification: a comparison of Teoh and Baker

Focuses on the intersection of administrative law, international law, and universal human rights concepts in Australia and Canada. Comparison of  court decision between the cases involving Ah Hin Teoh and the Canadian  Minister of Citizenship and Immigration; Effect of the ratified United Nations  Convention on the Rights of the Child on administrative decisions; Judicial supervision of executive actions.

Baker v The Queen & Fardon v Attorney General for the State of Queensland

In 2004, the High Court of Australia had cause to revisit its 1996 decision in Kable, as well as to consider the nature of judicial power as it relates to the deprivation of liberty, outside of the parameters of conventional criminal sentencing. The resulting decisions of Fardon and Baker demonstrate the lack of constitutional protections afforded to people who become the focus of governmental campaigns to be "tough on crime". The so-called "Kable principle", as construed by the High Court in 2004, may prove to be the "constitutional watch dog that barks but once".

Risk items associated with patient falls in oncology and medical settings

The aim of this study was to determine whether items on a falls risk-assessment tool, made up of brief cognitive and physical measures that nurses use in practice, differentiated fallers and nonfallers in oncology and medical settings. A measure of leg muscle strength clearly distinguished between fallers and nonfallers, with the latter having stronger leg muscles. For nursing practice, the assessment of patients' muscle strength seems to be the most useful scale for identifying potential fallers.