Effect of polymer microstructure on the docetaxel release and stability of polyurethane formulation

PurSil®AL20 (PUS), a copolymer of 4,4'-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (HMDI), 1,4-butane diol (BD), poly-tetramethylene oxide (PTMO) and poly-dimethyl siloxane (PDMS) was investigated for stability as a vehicle for Docetaxel (DTX) delivery through oesophageal drug eluting stent (DES). On exposure to stability test conditions, it was found that DTX release rate declined at 4 and 40 °C. In order to divulge reasons underlying this, changes in DTX solid state as well as PUS microstructure were followed. It was found that re-crystallization of DTX in PDMS rich regions was reducing the drug release at both 4 °C and 40 °C samples. So far microstructural features have not been correlated with stability and drug release, and in this study we found that at 40 °C increase in microstructural domain sizes and the inter-domain distances (from ∼85 Å to 129 Å) were responsible for hindering the DTX release in addition to DTX re-crystallization.

In vitro and in vivo assessment of docetaxel formulation developed for esophageal stents

Esophageal cancer (EC) mostly affects the elderly population and is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the most popular mode of palliation, but they are associated with reocclusion caused by tumor growth. To overcome this problem, docetaxel (DTX)-loaded polyurethane formulations were prepared for stent application. The films were evaluated against the cancer cell lines, OE-19 and OE-21, and normal esophageal cell line Het-1A. The DTX and the formulations were evaluated in vitro for the cytotoxicity and in vivo in nude mice. It was found that DTX and the formulations have a weak activity against the EC cell lines and an even weaker activity against Het-1A cell line. Preliminary in vivo studies showed skin toxicity in nude mice necessitating modification of the formulation. Reevaluation in a mouse xenograft model resulted in toxicity at high dose formulations while the low dose formulation exhibited modest advantage over commercial IV formulation; however, there was no significant difference between the commercial IV and blank formulation. DTX combination with an anti-cancer agent having complementary mode of action and non-overlapping toxicity could yield better outcome in future.