Rationale and design of the national benchmarking and evidence-based national clinical guidelines for chronic heart failure management programs study

OBJECTIVES: The National Benchmarks and Evidence-Based National Clinical Guidelines for Heart Failure Management Programs Study is a national, multicenter study designed to determine the nature, range, and effect of interventions applied by chronic heart failure management programs (CHF-MPs) throughout Australia on patient outcomes. Its primary objective is to use these data to develop national benchmarks and evidence-based clinical guidelines and optimize their cost-effective application by reducing quality and outcome variability. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary data will be collected from CHF-MP coordinators and CHF patients enrolled in these programs on a national basis. Secondary outcome data will be collected from a national morbidity record and from patients' medical records. STUDY DESIGN: Stage I of the study involves a prospective clinical audit of all CHF-MPs throughout Australia (n = 45) to determine the extent of variability in programs currently. Stage II is a prospective cross-sectional survey design enrolling 1,500 patients (average of 40 patients per program) to firstly determine the typical profile of patients being managed via a CHF-MP in Australia and, secondly, the subsequent morbidity and mortality during the 6-month follow-up. Outcome data will be subject to multivariate analysis to determine the key components of care in this regard. All study data will be then examined in the final stage of the study (III) to develop national benchmarks for the application and auditing of CHF-MPs in Australia. CONCLUSION: Variability in patient outcomes is a product of heterogeneity among CHF-MPs. The development of national benchmarks will minimize such heterogeneity and will provide a greater level of evidence for their cost-effective application.

Evidence based drug therapy : are optimal doses and multiple medication therapies realistic in patients with chronic heart failure

Background: Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) has a high mortality and morbidity. Large scale randomised controlled trials have proven the benefits of beta blockade and ACE inhibitors in reducing mortality in patients with CHF and expert guidelines mandate their use. In spite of these recommendations, important therapies are under-prescribed and under-utilised.

Method: 1015 consecutive patients enrolled in CHF management programs across Australia were surveyed during 2005-2006 to determine prescribing patterns in heart failure medications. These patients were followed-up for a period of 6 months.

Results: The survey revealed that beta blockers were prescribed to 80% of patients (more than 85% were on sub-optimal doses) and 70% were prescribed Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (approximately 50% were on sub-optimal dose). 19% of patients were prescribed Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). By 6 months <25% of the patients who were on sub-optimal dose beta blockers or ACE inhibitors at baseline, had been up-titrated to maximum dose (p<0.0001). In CHF programs, were nurses were able to titrate medications, 75% of patients reached optimal dose of beta blockers compared to those programs with no nurse-led medication titration, where only 25% of patients reached optimal dose (p<0.004). When examining optimal dosage for any two of these mandatory medications, less patients were on optimal therapy. Beta blockers and ACE inhibitors, were both prescribed in combination in 60% of patients. While beta blockers and ARBs were prescribed to 15% of patients.

Conclusion: Whilst prescribing rates for a single medication strategy of beta blockers, or ACE inhibitors were greater than 70%, an increase in dosage of these medications and utilisation of proven combination therapy of these medications was poor. It is suggested that clinical outcomes for this cohort of patients could be further improved by adherence to evidence-based practice, ESC guidelines, and optimisation of these medications by heart failure nurses in a CHF program. On the basis of these findings and in the absence of ready access to a polypill, focussing on evidence-based practice to increase utilisation and optimal dosage of combination medication therapy is critical.

Heterogeneity in service delivery and inequity in access are common characteristics of chronic heart failure management programs

Background: The prevalence of heart failure in Australia is similar to that of Europe. In Australia, chronic heart failure management programs (CHF-MPs) have become part of standard care for patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF). However, heterogeneity among programs is common which can result in variable patient outcomes.

Method: A national survey was undertaken of 59 post-discharge CHF-MPs identified from within the Australian health care system. Two had ceased operating and one centre declined to participate in the study. A 33-item investigator-developed questionnaire, examining the characteristics and interventions used within each CHF-MP, was sent to the remaining 56 CHF-MPs. A response rate of 100% was achieved.

Results: Our survey revealed a disproportional distribution of CHF-MPs across the Australian continent: the State of Victoria had 3.6 CHF-MPs/million population, New South Wales had 3.7 CHF-MPs/million population, Queensland had 1 program/million population, South Australia had 0.3 CHF-MPs/million population and Western Australia had 1 program/million population.Overall, 8000 postdischarge CHF pts (median: 126; IQR: 26-260) were managed via CHF-MPs. Approximately 40,000 CHF pts are discharged from metropolitan institutions nationally, this represents only 22% of the potential caseload for these cost-effective CHF-MPs. Only 8% of these programs were located within rural regions. The majority of CHF-MPs were located within an acute metropolitan hospital (52%) and 36% were community based (all associated with a hospital). Heterogeneity of CHF-MPs in applied models of care was evident with 75% of CHF-MPs offering CHF outpatient clinics and 77% conducting home visits. Of the programs offering home visits 78% were funded by regional government (p<0.048). There were no nurse-led CHF outpatient clinics. A hybrid approach to CHF-MPs was common with many CHF-MPs comprising an outpatient clinic, home visits and inpatient visits. Various medications were titrated by nurses in 43% of CHF-MPs. In the programs that allowed nurses to titrate medications 79% were located in an acute hospital (p<0.011).

Conclusion: Variability of service availability is of concern within the context of universal coverage. In addition, heterogeneity between programs and the diversity in models of care delivery highlights the inconsistency and questions the quality of health related outcomes. We are currently analysing health outcome data from the 1015 patients managed in these CHF-MPs to describe the relationship between quality of care and health outcomes.

Chronic heart failure programs : does more equal less? (BENCH study)

The national multi-centre study (49 programs, 1158 patients) developed a quality score (HF-IS) and the national benchmarks for heart programs. The higher a program scored on the HF-IS the greater the reduction in hospital admissions and mortality. This score has the potential to change national nursing practice and improve health outcomes of patients.

Comparing methods for prescribing exercise for individuals with chronic heart failure

This study examined the accuracy of current recommended guidelines for prescribing exercise intensity using the methods of percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR), percentage of VO₂ peak (%VO₂peak) and percentage of VO₂ reserve (%VO₂R) in a clinical population of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. The precision of prescription of exercise intensity for 45 patients with stable CHF (39:6 M:F, 65±9 yrs (mean±SD)) was investigated. VO₂peak testing is relatively common among patients with cardiac disease, but the assessment of VO₂rest is not common practice and the accepted standard value of 3.5 mL/kg/min is assumed in the application of %VO2R (%VO₂R_3.5). In this study, VO₂rest was recorded for 3 min prior to the start of a symptom-limited exercise test on a cycle ergometer. Target exercise intensities were calculated using the VO₂ corresponding to 50 or 80 %HRR, VO₂peak and VO₂R. The VO₂ values were then converted into prescribed speeds on a treadmill in km/hr at 1 %grade using ACSM’s metabolic equation for walking. Target intensities and prescribed treadmill speeds were also calculated with the %VO₂R method using the mean VO₂rest value of participants (3.9 mL/kg/min) (%VO₂R_3.9). This was then compared to the exercise intensities and prescribed treadmill speeds using patient’s measured VO₂rest. Error in prescription correlates the difference between %VO₂R_3.5 and %VO₂R_3.9 compared to %VO₂R with measured VO₂rest. Prescription of exercise intensity through the %HRR method is imprecise for patients on medications that blunt the HR response to exercise. %VO₂R method offers a significant improvement in exercise prescription compared to %VO₂peak. However, a disparity of 10 % still exists in the %VO₂R method using the standard 3.5 mL/kg/min for VO₂rest in the %VO₂R equation. The mean measured VO₂rest in the 45 CHF patients was 11 % higher (3.9±0.8 mL/kg/min) than the standard value provided by ACSM. Applying the mean measured VO₂rest value of 3.9 mL/kg/min rather than the standard assumed value of 3.5 mL/kg/min proved to be closer to the prescribed intensity determined by the actual measured resting VO₂. These results suggest that the %HRR method should not be used to prescribe exercise intensity for CHF patients. Instead, VO₂ should be used to prescribe exercise intensity and be expressed as %VO₂R with measured variables (VO₂rest and VO₂peak).

Reliability of isokinetic strength and aerobic power testing for patients with chronic heart failure

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of testing skeletal muscle strength and peak aerobic power in a clinical population of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

METHODS: Thirty-three patients with CHF (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class 2.3 ± 0.5; left ventricular ejection fraction 27% ± 7%; age 65 ± 9 years; 28:5 male-female ratio) underwent two identical series of tests (T1 and T2), 1 week apart, for strength and endurance of the muscle groups responsible for knee extension/flexion and elbow extension/flexion. The patients also underwent two graded exercise tests on a bicycle ergometer to measure peak oxygen consumption (VO_2peak). Three months later, 18 of the patients underwent a third test (T3) for each of the measures. Means were compared using MANOVA with repeated measures for strength and endurance, and ANOVA with repeated measures for VO_2peak.

RESULTS: Combining data for all four movement patterns, the expression of strength increased from T1 to T2 by 12% ± 25% (P < .001; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.89). Correspondingly, endurance increased by 13% ± 23% (P = .004; ICC = 0.87). Peak oxygen consumption was not significantly different (16.2 ± 0.8 and 16.1 ± 0.8 mL·kg^-1·min^-1 for T1 and T2, respectively;P = .686; ICC = 0.91). There were no significant differences between T2 and T3 for strength (2% ± 17%;P = .736; ICC = 0.92) or muscle endurance (-1% ± 15%;P = .812; ICC = 0.96), but VO_2peak decreased from 16.7 ± 1.2 to 14.9 ± 0.9 mL·kg^-1·min^-1 (-10% ± 18%;P = .021; ICC = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in a population of patients with CHF, a familiarization trial for skeletal muscle strength testing is necessary. Although familiarization is not required for assessing oxygen consumption as a single measurement, VO_2peak declined markedly in the 3-month period for which these patients were followed. Internal consistency within patients was high for the second and third strength trials and the first and second tests of VO_2peak.

Moderate-intensity resistance exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure improves strength, endurance, heart rate variability, and forearm blood flow

Thirty-nine CHF patients (New York Heart Association Functional Class = 2.3±0.5; left ventricular ejection fraction 28%±7%; age 65±11 years; 33:6 male:female) underwent 2 identical series of tests, 1 week apart, for strength and endurance of the knee and elbow extensors and flexors, VO_2peak, HRV, FBF at rest, and FBF activated by forearm exercise or limb ischemia. Patients were then randomized to 3 months of resistance training (EX, n = 19), consisting of mainly isokinetic (hydraulic) ergometry, interspersed with rest intervals, or continuance with usual care (CON, n = 20), after which they underwent repeat endpoint testing. Combining all 4 movement patterns, strength increased for EX by 21±30% (mean±SD, P<.01) after training, whereas endurance improved 21±21% (P<.01). Corresponding data for CON remained almost unchanged (strength P<.005, endurance P<.003 EX versus CON). VO_2peak improved in EX by 11±15% (P<.01), whereas it decreased by 10±18% (P<.05) in CON (P<.001 EX versus CON). The ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency spectral power fell after resistance training in EX by 44±53% (P<.01), but was unchanged in CON (P<.05 EX versus CON). FBF increased at rest by 20±32% (P<.01), and when stimulated by submaximal exercise (24±32%, P<.01) or limb ischemia (26±45%, P<.01) in EX, but not in CON (P<.01 EX versus CON).