Cleavage of Ru-C(aryl) bond of a four-membered ortho-metalated ruthenium(II) organometallics by mercaptopyrimidine and pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate ligands: spectroscopic, structural and computational studies

The heterogeneous phase reaction of Ru(η2-RL)(PPh3)2(CO)Cl (1) with 2-mercaptopyrimidine(pymSH) and pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate(dipic) ligands afforded the complexes of the type Ru(PPh3)(CO)(pymS)2 (2) and Ru(PPh3)2(CO)(dipic) (3) in excellent yield respectively. The chelation of pymS/dipic is attended with the cleavage of Ru-O, Ru-Cl and Ru-C(aryl) bonds and the RL ligand is no longer coordinated with the metal center in the products. The spectral (UV-Vis, IR, 1H NMR) and electrochemical data of the complexes are included. In dichloromethane solution both 2 and 3 display one quasi-reversible RuIII/RuII cyclic voltammetric response with E1/2 in the range 1.15-1.50 V vs Ag/AgCl. Structure determinations of 2 and the solvate 3·CH3CN have revealed distorted octahedral RuCN2S2P coordination sphere for 2 and RuCNO2P2 coordination sphere for 3·CH3CN. For 2 the pairs (P, N), (S, S) and (C, N) define the three trans directions whereas for 3·CH3CN those pairs are (P, P), (C, N) and (O, O). The electronic structures and the absorption spectra of 2 and 3 are also scrutinized by the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) analysis.

Prevalence of the thioamide {···H-N-C=S}2 synthon-solid-state (X-ray crystallography), solution (NMR) and gas-phase (theoretical) structures of O-methyl-N-aryl-thiocarbamides

Structural investigations, i.e. solid-state (X-ray), solution (¹H NMR) and gas-phase (theoretical), on molecules with the general formula MeOC(S)N(H)C₆H₄-4-Y: Y = H (1), NO₂ (2), C(O)Me (3), Cl (4) have shown a general preference for the adoption of an E-conformation about the central C–N bond. Such a conformation allows for the formation of a dimeric hydrogen-bonded {H–N–C=S}₂ synthon as the building block. In the cases of 1–3, additional C–H^...O interactions give rise to the formation of tapes of varying topology. A theoretical analysis shows that the preference for the E-conformation is about the same as the crystal packing stabilisation energy and consistent with this, the compound with Y = C(O)OMe, (5), adopts a Z-conformation in the solid-state that facilitates the formation of N–H^...O, C–H^...O and C–H^...S interactions, leading to a layer structure. Global crystal packing considerations are shown to be imperative in dictating the conformational form of molecules 1–5.

Acylmethyl(aryl)tellurium(IV,II) derivatives : intramolecular secondary bonding and steric rigidity

Electrophilic substitution of acylmethanes (methyl ketones), RCOCH3 (R = i-Pr, 1; Et, 2; Me, 3) with aryltellurium trichlorides, ArTeCl3 (Ar = 1-C10H7, Np, A; 2,4,6-Me3C6H2, Mes, B; 4-MeOC6H4, Anisyl, C) under mild conditions affords the corresponding acylmethyl(aryl)tellurium dichlorides (RCOCH2)ArTeCl2. Reduction of the dichlorides, gives tellurides, (i-PrCOCH2)ArTe, 1A–1C, which give the corresponding dihalides, (i-PrCOCH2)ArTeX2 (X = Cl, 1Aa–1Ca; Br, 1Ab–1Cb; I, 1Ac–1Cc) when reacted in situ with SO2Cl2, Br2 or I2. The unsymmetric tellurides are labile towards disproportionation and attempts to obtain them lead to the isolation of Ar2Te2 except in the case of (i-PrCOCH2)MesTe ( 1B), which represents an interesting example of a kinetically stable aryl(alkyl)telluride. All the dihalomesityltellurium(IV) derivatives show separate 1H and 13C NMR signals for the ortho methyls irrespective of the sizes of R and X ligands. The telluride, 1B with free rotation about Te–C(mesityl) bond shows, like the unsymmetric diorganotellurium(IV) dihalides, only one 125Te NMR signal. The 1,4-chelating behavior of the acyl ligand among diorganotellurium(IV) compounds is inferred from the X-ray diffraction data for 1Aa, 1Ac, 1Ba, 1Bb, 1Ca and 1Cc which are indicative of the presence of intramolecular TeO secondary bonding interactions (SBIs) at least in the solid state. As a consequence, steric repulsion in case of the mesityltellurium(IV) derivatives, 1Ba and 1Bb, reaches the threshold so as to cause loss of two-fold rotational symmetry of the mesityl group about the Te–C(mesityl) bond axis. Intermolecular C–HO H-bonding interactions appears to stabilize such an orientation of the aryl ligand at least in the solid state.

An in vitro comparative assessment with a series of new triphenyltin(IV) 2-/4-[(E)-2-(aryl)-1-diazenyl]benzoates endowed with anticancer activities: Structural modifications, analysis of efficacy and cytotoxicity involving human tumor cell lines

Four new triphenyltin(IV) complexes of composition Ph₃SnLH (where LH = 2-/4-[(E)-2-(aryl)-1-diazenyl]benzoate) (1–4) were synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic (¹H, ¹³C and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR, IR, ¹¹⁹Sn Mössbauer) techniques in combination with elemental analysis. The ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopic data indicate a tetrahedral coordination geometry in non-coordinating solvents. The crystal structures of three complexes, Ph₃SnL¹H (1), Ph₃SnL³H (3), Ph₃SnL⁴H (4), were determined. All display an essentially tetrahedral geometry with angles ranging from 93.50(8) to 124.5(2)°; ¹¹⁹Sn Mössbauer spectral data support this assignment. The cytotoxicity studies were performed with complexes 1–4, along with a previously reported complex (5) in vitro across a panel of human tumor cell lines viz., A498, EVSA-T, H226, IGROV, M19 MEL, MCF-7 and WIDR. The screening results were compared with the results from other related triphenyltin(IV) complexes (6–7) and tributyltin(IV) complexes (8–11) having 2-/4-[(E)-2-(aryl)-1-diazenyl]benzoates framework. In general, the complexes exhibit stronger cytotoxic activity. The results obtained for 1–3 are also comparable to those of its o-analogs i.e. 4–7, except 5, but the advantage is the former set of complexes demonstrated two folds more cytotoxic activity for the cell line MCF-7 with ID₅₀ values in the range 41–53 ng/ml. Undoubtedly, the cytotoxic results of complexes 1–3 are far superior to CDDP, 5-FU and ETO, and related tributyltin(IV) complexes 8–11. The quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies for the cytotoxicity of triphenyltin(IV) complexes 1–7 and tributyltin(IV) complexes 8–11 is also discussed against a panel of human tumor cell lines.