Improving the communication between care providers of individuals who may require joint replacement surgery (JRS) a framework for referral

Aims & rationale/Objectives : The objective of the project was to specify the information required in referrals to public hospital orthopaedic outpatient departments in order to streamline the care and prioritisation of individuals who may require JRS. It was envisaged that an evidence-based GP-Orthopaedic derived referral system would assist in ensuring that the right person accessed the right care at the right time.

Methods : In collaboration with the RACGP and the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, a national stakeholder working group was convened. A scoping document was prepared with input from key stakeholders. A review of primary research was undertaken as well as a review of relevant guidelines. Information on the implementation and evaluation of similar programs in Australia and overseas also informed the referral specification.

Principal findings : The initial scoping processes with key stakeholders provided clear information on core components of the referral. These were the use of standardised and respected assessment tools to determine the severity of arthritis, fitness for surgery and willingness of affected individuals to undergo surgery.

Discussion : About 20,000 JRS occur each year in public hospitals which emanate from 5 to 10 fold number of referrals. Arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases are a national health priority area reflecting the high burden of disease associated with these conditions. Various initiatives are being undertaken to address the quality of life of affected individuals. This project has revealed areas of potential improvement in the communication between care providers of individuals who may need JRS.

Implications : The project will result in the development of a standard referral form and guidelines to assist referring practitioners to communicate more effectively with the multidisciplinary care team, in particular orthopaedic care providers. The guidelines will be piloted in a large rural setting.

Severely compromised quality of life in women and those of lower socioeconomic status waiting for joint replacement surgery

Objective
To determine health-related quality of life (HRQOL), psychological distress, physical function, and self efficacy in persons waiting for lower-limb joint replacement surgery.

Methods
A total of 214 patients on a waiting list for unilateral primary total knee or hip replacement at a large Australian public teaching hospital completed questionnaires after entry to the list. HRQOL and psychological distress were compared with available population norms.

Results
Average HRQOL was extremely poor (mean ± SD 0.39 ± 0.24) and much lower (>2 SD) than the population norm. Near death-equivalent HRQOL or worse than death-equivalent HRQOL were reported by 15% of participants. High or very high psychological distress was up to 5 times more prevalent in the waiting list sample (relative risk 5.4 for participants ages 75 years and older; 95% confidence interval 3.3, 9.0). Women had significantly lower HRQOL, self efficacy, and physical function scores than men. After adjusting for age and sex, significant socioeconomic disparities were also found. Participants who received the lowest income had the poorest HRQOL; those with the least education or the lowest income had the highest psychological distress. Low self efficacy was moderately associated with poor HRQOL (r = 0.49, P < 0.001) and more strongly associated with high psychological distress (r = -0.55, P < 0.001).

Conclusion
Patients waiting for joint replacement have very poor HRQOL and high psychological distress, especially women and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Lengthy waiting lists mean patients can experience extended and potentially avoidable morbidity. Interventions to address psychological distress and self efficacy could reduce this burden and should target women and lower socioeconomic groups.

Quality of life and depression among older patients waiting for joint replacement surgery

Purpose: Older patients waiting for joint replacement surgery in many western countries experience lengthy waits for their surgery. Although these patients suffer with mobility problems the nature of the disability associated with waiting for surgery is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine health-related quality of life and symptoms of depression in persons waiting for their initial orthopaedic consultation following referral for total knee or total hip replacement surgery.

Methods: All patients who were waiting for an initial orthopaedic consultation for lower-limb joint replacement as at 25 August 2005 were surveyed. Participants were mailed questionnaires concerning demographic information, medical history, health-related quality of life (the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument), and symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression (CES-D) Scale).

Results: The 84 respondents (response rate 64%) had a mean age of 68.3 (SD 11.5 years), and 60% or respondents were women. Respondents reported an average of 1.6 (SD 0.9) medical conditions, and 85% reported osteoarthritis.} The average health-related quality of life was low (mean AQoL 0.38; SD 0.27), and near death-equivalent or worse than death-equivalent health-related quality of life (AQoL<0.1 of a maximum possible 1.0) was reported by 23% of the participants.The mean depression scale score was 16.5 (SD 11.1), and symptoms of depression (CES-D>16 of a maximum possible 60) were reported by 35% of the sample. There was a strong correlation between health-related quality of life and depression (r=–0.6).

Conclusions: Almost a third of patients waiting to see an orthopaedic surgeon about joint replacement surgery for their hip or knee had symptoms of depression. Geriatric rehabilitation services often provide interventions to these patients. The very poor quality of life reported suggests that more than exercise and strengthening will be needed to reduce disability.

Polyethyleneterephthalate provides superior retention of endothelial cells during shear stress compared to polytetrafluoroethylene and pericardium

Background

Polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are polymers successfully used as large diameter arterial grafts for peripheral vascular surgery. However, these prosthetic grafts are rarely used for coronary bypass surgery because of their low patency rates. Endothelialisation of the lumenal surface of these materials may improve their patency. This study aimed to compare the endothelialisation of PET, PTFE and pericardium by examining their seeding efficiency over time and the effect of various shear stresses on retention of endothelial cells.

Methods


Ovine endothelial cells at 4 × 105 cells/cm2 were seeded onto PET, PTFE and pericardium, and cultured for 1–168 hours. Cell coverage was determined via en face immunocytochemistry and cell retention was quantified after being subjected to shear stresses ranging from 0.018 to 0.037 N/m2 for 15, 30 and 60 minutes.

Results

Endothelial cells adhered to all of the materials one hour post-seeding. PET exhibited better cell retention rate, ranging from 66.9 ± 5.6% at 0.018 N/m2 for 15 min to 44.7 ± 1.9% at 0.037 N/m2 for 60 minutes, when compared to PTFE and pericardium (p < 0.0001, three-way ANOVA).

Conclusion

PET shows superior retention of endothelial cells during shear stress compare to PTFE and pericardium.