Teaching EBP : part 2 – making sense of clinical practice guidelines

Previously, we indicated that we wanted to address the dialogue pertaining to education and teaching approaches to increase the use of specific types of evidence that exist to guide and inform practice, and began this by focusing on Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). This column builds on that knowledge to highlight how educators can use CPGs in practice and change situations whilst also raising awareness of the limitations of these tools in terms of their impact on practice.

Using meta-synthesis to facilitate evidence-based practice

In a previous column, Fineout-Overholt et al. (2008) discussed the use of systematic reviews in decision making for clinical practice, focusing primarily on the quantitative studies, such as randomised controlled trials. Narrative reviews were included but in less detail; this was intentional because the synthesis of qualitative evidence is a complex process and has evoked significant discussion over the past 5 years. Consequently, this column addresses some of the process issues surrounding qualitative evidence synthesis, or meta-synthesis as it is more commonly known, and offers ideas for how evidence arising from these can be used to inform education, teaching, and practice.

How systematic reviews can foster evidence-based clinical decisions : part II

In the prior issue, we spoke about what a systematic review is and where a clinician can find this important evidence for decision making (Fineout-Overholt et al. 2008). In this column, we will address what is involved in conducting a systematic review, and how critically appraising a systematic review informs clinicians of the best evidence available to make decisions that impact outcomes.