Corrosion behaviour of direct current and active screen plasma carburised AISI 316 stainless steel in boiling sulphuric acid solutions

Active screen plasma is a recently developed plasma surface alloying technique, which has shown potential for addressing some drawbacks associated with conventional direct current plasma processes. In this study, the corrosion performance of untreated, direct current and active screen plasma carburised AISI 316 was investigated by immersion in a boiling solution of sulphuric acid. The experimental results show that the corrosion behaviour of expanded austenite produced by low temperature plasma carburising is controlled by the type and density of surface defects; the corrosion properties of the active screen plasma carburised material are superior to that produced by direct current plasma because of the significantly reduced edge effect and surface defects; and the bias level used in the active screen carburising treatment has a profound effect on the corrosion performance of the material. Based on the experimental results, the corrosion mechanisms involved are discussed.

Study of active screen plasma processing conditions for carburising and nitriding austenitic stainless steel

Active screen (AS) is an advanced technology for plasma surface engineering, which offers some advantages over conventional direct current (DC) plasma treatments. Such surface defects and process instabilities as arcing, edge and hollow cathode effects can be minimised or completely eliminated by the AS technique, with consequent improvements in surface quality and material properties. However, the lack of information and thorough understanding of the process mechanisms generate scepticism in industrial practitioners. In this project, AISI 316 specimens were plasma carburised and plasma nitrided at low temperature in AS and DC furnaces, and the treated samples were comparatively analysed. Two diagnostic techniques were used to study the plasma: optical fibre assisted optical emission spectroscopy, and a planar electrostatic probe. Optimum windows of treatment conditions for AS plasma nitriding and AS plasma carburising of austenitic stainless steel were identified and some evidence was obtained on the working principles of AS furnaces. These include the sputtering of material from the cathodic mesh and its deposition on the worktable, the generation of additional active species, and the electrostatic confinement of the plasma within the operative volume of the furnace.

Experimental and finite element analysis of machinability of AL-6XN super austenitic stainless steel

This paper presents a finite element cutting modelbased on physical microstructure to investigate the thermomechanicalbehaviour of AL-6XN Super AusteniticStainless Steel in the primary shear zone. Frozen chip rootsamples were created under dry turning operation to observethe plasticity behaviour occurring in the shear zones to comparewith the model for analysis. Chip samples were generatedunder cutting velocities at 65 and 94 m/min, feed rate at0.2 mm/rev and depth of cut at 1 mm. Temperature on thecutting zone was recorded by infrared thermal camera.Secondary and backscatter electron detectors were used toinvestigate the deformed microstructure and to calculate theplastic strain. Experimental results showed the formation ofmicrocracks (build-up edge triggers) at the chip root stagnationzone of both samples. The austenite phase patterns wereevident against the cutting tool tip in the stagnation zone of thechip root fabricated at 65 m/min. The movement of thesepatterns caused the formation of the slip lines within thegrains. The backscatter diffraction maps showed the formationof special grain boundaries within the slip lines, workhardeninglayer and in the chip region. Strain measurementsin the microstructures of the chip roots fabricated at 94 and65 m/min showed high values of 6.5 and 5.7 (mm/mm) respectively.The finite element model was used to measure thestress, strain, temperature and chip morphology. Numericalresults were compared to the outcomes of the experimentalwork to validate the finite element model. The model validatingprocess showed good agreement between theexperimental and numerical results, and the error values werecalculated. For a 94- and 65-m/min cutting speeds, 7.5 and5.2% were the errors in the strain, 3 and 2.5% were the error inthe temperature and 4.7 and 6.8% were the error in the shearplane angles.