Realist evaluation of a remote hospital programme in the context of Australian health care reforms

Background: Since 2008, Australia has embarked on major healthcare reforms extending across all states and territories. Only limited evidence linking national healthcare reforms to improvement in public hospital performance exists. This evidence gap is even more pronounced in the case of remote hospital performance. This article describes a protocol retrospectively assessing a remote hospital programme to implement emergency department performance indicators, in the context of national reforms, over a period of 7 years (2008–2014). Challenges to implementing these reforms are explored.Method: Assessing the complex scenario of reform implementation requires an in-depth analysis, offered by a Realist Evaluation framework. Within this framework, a case study design is adopted to enable descriptive analysis. Interviews with key hospital stakeholders were followed by a literature review to identify a programme theory. The programme theory was articulated in the form of a preliminary context-mechanism-outcome configuration (CMOC). This theory will underlie further data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Both Realist Evaluation and case study allow flexibility in a choice of methods; both quantitative and qualitative methods will be incorporated. The thematic analysis will be employed to identify causal relationships and linkages in collected data.Discussion: Assembled data will be used to develop final CMOC patterns. The final CMOC will help in understanding the theory and mechanisms in use in the hospital.

Recognising and responding to 'cutting corners' when providing nursing care: a qualitative study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to report on a key finding of a larger study investigating the 'gaps' in patient care that registered nurses encounter during the course of their practice. A key finding of this larger study was that 'cutting corners' was a gap discerned by nurses. BACKGROUND: 'Cutting corners' has been characterised as a 'violation' and threat to patient safety, although there is a paucity of research on this issue. DESIGN: Naturalistic inquiry using a qualitative exploratory descriptive approach. METHODS: Data were collected from a purposeful sample of 71 registered nurses from emergency department, critical care, perioperative, rehabilitation and transitional care and neurosciences settings in Australia and analysed using content and thematic analysis strategies. RESULTS: Cutting corners was a common practice that encompassed (1) the partial or complete omission of patient care, (2) delays in providing care and (3) the failure to do things correctly. Corners were cut in patient assessment, essential nursing care, the care of central venous catheters and medication administration. The practice of cutting corners was perceived as contributing to preventable adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that cutting corners created gaps that contributed to unfinished nursing care and preventable adverse events. The findings of the study raise the possibility that cutting corners is a salient but underinvestigated characteristic of nursing practice. Further research and inquiry are needed to deepen understanding of cutting corners and its impact on patient safety. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Identifying the nature and implications of cutting corners when providing nursing care is an important contributing factor to improving patient safety and quality care.

When continuity of care breaks down: a systems failure in identification of osteoporosis risk in older patients treated for minimal trauma fractures

OBJECTIVE: Minimal trauma fractures may be the first indication of osteoporosis. Our aim was to determine the proportion of patients who underwent bone density testing for osteoporosis of those with a minimal trauma wrist fracture treated in the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN: This observational retrospective cohort study used explicit medical record review and scripted telephone interviews.

SETTING: EDs of three metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne in 2006.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 50 years and over who were treated for wrist fracture due to minimal trauma. Data collected included demographic details, fracture details, causes of injury, any bone density testing and any osteoporosis-related medication change.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of patients who underwent bone density testing in the follow-up period.

RESULTS: 131 patients were studied; 83% were female, and the median age was 71 years. No patient was referred by an ED or fracture clinic for bone density testing (95% CI, 0-3.5%). Telephone follow-up data were obtained from 91 patients. Of these, 28 reported having bone density testing after their fracture, of whom 14 (50%; 95% CI, 32%-67%) were found to have osteoporosis. Seven were treated with a bisphosphonate and one with a selective oestrogen-receptor modulator.

CONCLUSION: Follow-up of patients suffering minimal trauma wrist fractures treated in the ED is poor. Systems to improve the identification and treatment of osteoporosis in this group are needed if future osteoporotic fractures and their consequences are to be avoided.

Impact of oral dexamethasone versus placebo after ED treatment of migraine with phenothiazines on the rate of recurrent headache: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests that the rate of recurrent headache after treatment of migraine in the emergency department (ED) is high. The mechanisms for this are unclear, but neurogenic inflammation may play a role. There is conflicting evidence about whether adjuvant dexamethasone reduces the rate of recurrent headache. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of recurrent headache in patients with migraine randomised to receive a single dose of oral dexamethasone or placebo at discharge after treatment in the ED with intravenous phenothiazine.

METHODS: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in the ED of three community teaching hospitals. Adult patients with physician-diagnosed migraine were treated with intravenous phenothiazine and at discharge were randomised to receive either 8 mg oral dexamethasone or placebo as a single dose. Follow-up was by telephone at 48-72 h and the proportion of patients with recurrent headache overall and in the subgroup with headache duration <24 h was recorded.

RESULTS: 63 patients (76% women) of median age 39 years were enrolled, 61 of whom (97%) completed follow-up. The pooled rate of recurrent headache was 33%. 32 were randomised to placebo and 31 to dexamethasone. The rate of recurrent headache in the dexamethasone and control groups was 27% (8/30) vs 39% (12/31) (relative risk (RR) 0.69, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.45, p = 0.47). For 40 patients with headache lasting <24 h the rate of recurrent headache in the dexamethasone and control groups was 15% (3/20) vs 45% (9/20), a reduction in absolute risk of 30% (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.05, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION: A single oral dose of dexamethasone following phenothiazine treatment for migraine in the ED did not reduce the rate of recurrent headache. There is weak evidence for a possible benefit in the subgroup who present within <24 h of symptom onset. A multicentre trial to confirm this finding is warranted.