Vilken typ av rättvisa ska råda i framtiden : Om rättvisa, målkonflikter och demokratiska processerinför FN:s nya hållbara utvecklingsmål

Hösten 2015 väntas FN:s medlemsstater fatta beslut om millenniemålens efterföljare:Sustainable Development Goals; SDG. Uppsatsen syftar till att ge svar på frågan omvilka olika typer av rättvisa som dessa nya föreslagna hållbara utvecklingsmål, SDG,ger uttryck för. Utöver detta tas frågan om risken för eventuella målkonflikter upp,liksom på vilket sätt processerna som föregått besluten om målen ger uttryck förvärderingar knutna till demokratiskt beslutsfattande. Uppsatsen utgår från rättvisasom etiskt begrepp och analysen bygger på teorier från John Rawls, MarthaNussbaum och Seyla Benhabib. Genom närläsning och argumentationsanalys nåsföljande slutsatser: det råder flera olika typer av rättvisa inom SDG, de olika typernaav rättvisa bidrar till risken för målkonflikter samt att processerna som föregått målenger uttryck för värderingar knutna till demokratiskt beslutsfattande. Trots dessavärderingar föreligger risk för svårigheter med förankring, implementering ochgovernance av de framtida SDG. Den etiktradition som dominerade inom denuvarande millenniemålen, var den traditionella antropocentrismen. Etiken för hållbarutveckling har fått betydligt större utrymme i SDG.

A framework for ICT-based knowledge sharing in sustainable rural development : the case of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

Some 50% of the people in the world live in rural areas, often under harsh conditions and in poverty. The need for knowledge of how to improve living conditions is well documented. In response to this need, new knowledge of how to improve living conditions in rural areas and elsewhere is continuously being developed by researchers and practitioners around the world. People in rural areas, in particular, would certainly benefit from being able to share relevant knowledge with each other, as well as with stakeholders (e.g. researchers) and other organizations (e.g. NGOs). Central to knowledge management is the idea of knowledge sharing. This study is based on the assumption that knowledge management can support sustainable development in rural and remote regions. It aims to present a framework for knowledge management in sustainable rural development, and an inventory of existing frameworks for that. The study is interpretive, with interviews as the primary source for the inventory of stakeholders, knowledge categories and Information and Communications Technology (ICT) infrastructure. For the inventory of frameworks, a literature study was carried out. The result is a categorization of the stakeholders who act as producers and beneficiaries of explicit and indigenous development knowledge. Stakeholders are local government, local population, academia, NGOs, civil society and donor agencies. Furthermore, the study presents a categorization of the development knowledge produced by the stakeholders together with specifications for the existing ICT infrastructure. Rural development categories found are research, funding, agriculture, ICT, gender, institutional development, local infrastructure development, and marketing & enterprise. Finally, a compiled framework is presented, and it is based on ten existing frameworks for rural development that were found in the literature study, and the empirical findings of the Gilgit-Baltistan case. Our proposed framework is divided in four levels where level one consists of the identified stakeholders, level two consists of rural development categories, level three of the knowledge management system and level four of sustainable rural development based on the levels below. In the proposed framework we claim that the sustainability of rural development can be achieved through a knowledge society in which knowledge of the rural development process is shared among all relevant stakeholders.