1 resultado para Judges.
em Dalarna University College Electronic Archive
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (12)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (12)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad del Valle - Colombia (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (13)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (12)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (39)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (8)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (19)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (46)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (44)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (50)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (33)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (79)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (6)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (15)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (6)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (27)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (46)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (150)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Negotiating experience in the court How do judges assess witness credibility, and how do they proceed to reach sustainable conclusions in a criminal court? This article is based on discussions in four focus groups with lay judges in Swedish district courts. In criminal court trials, a version of an event is generally reinforced if it is confirmed by witnesses. However, if their narratives are too similar, none of them is found trustworthy. The focus group participants agreed that if witnesses were suspected of having discussed their individual experiences of an event and accommodated them into a common story, their testimonies were not considered credible. While testimonies should ideally be untainted by other people’s impressions and opinions, other rules govern the truth of the court. The lay judges appreciated their deliberations, including negotiations on impressions and memories of the trial, and they sometimes adjusted their perceptions in the light of information provided by other members of the court. However, if the lay judges are viewed as witnesses of what takes place in the trial, this gives rise to a paradox: While witness negotiations on experiences are regarded as a means to construct a false or biased story, the same kind of interaction between the judges is considered necessary to establish a consensual truth of what actually happened.