Stress på akutmottagningen ur ett sjuksköterskeperspektiv : En litteraturstudie

Sjuksköterskor som arbetar på akutmottagningar utsätts regelbundet för stress. Det medför psykiska och fysiska besvär för sjuksköterskor och försämrad omvårdnad för patienten. Studien avser att utifrån vetenskaplig litteratur sammanställa de faktorer som leder till stress för sjuksköterskor som arbetar på akutmottagningar och hur vården påverkas av stressade sjuksköteskor. Syfte Syftet med litteraturstudien var att beskriva vilka faktorer på akutmottagningen som upplevdes bidra till stress för sjuksköterskor som arbetar på en akutmottagning och hur stressen påverkar sjuksköterskors möjligheter att erbjuda en god vård för patienter på akutmottagningen. Metod Studien har genomförts som en litteraturstudie. I studien användes 15 artiklar som bestod av både kvalitativ och kvantitativ ansats. Materialet hämtades i databaserna CINAHL och PubMed. Resultat Resultatet visar att det finns flera olika faktorer som bidrar till stress för sjuksköterskor på akutmottagningen. Stressande faktorer visade sig utifrån studierna i resultatet vara; hög arbetsbelastning och låg bemanning, avsaknad av tid för reflektion för sjuksköterskan, att vårda barn i stressade situationer, hot och våld på akutmottagningen, kommunikation samt smärta och lidande. Hur vården påverkas av sjuksköterskors stress på akutmottagningen var utifrån studierna att patientsäkerheten blev försämrad och att vårdrelationen påverkades. Slutsats Författarna drar slutsatsen att stress påverkar sjuksköteskors arbetsuppgifter på akutmottagningen. Patienters möjlighet till patientsäker och god vård på akutmottagningen påverkas negativt av stressade sjuksköterskor. För att komma till rätta med sjuksköterskebristen på akutmottagningar så är det av betydelse för sjukhusledningen att arbeta preventivt mot stressade sjuksköterskor.

The Survivability of Swedish Emergency Management Related Research Centers and Academic Programs : A Preliminary Sociology of Science Analysis

The Survivability of Swedish Emergency Management Related Research Centers and Academic Programs: A Preliminary Sociology of Science Analysis Despite being a relatively safe nation, Sweden has four different universities supporting four emergency management research centers and an equal and growing number of academic programs. In this paper, I discuss how these centers and programs survive within the current organizational environment. The sociology of science or the sociology of scientific knowledge perspectives should provide a theoretical guide. Yet, scholars of these perspectives have produced no research on these related topics. Thus, the population ecology model and the notion of organizational niche provide my theoretical foundation. My data come from 26 interviews from those four institutions, the gathering of documents, and observations. I found that each institution has found its own niche with little or no competition – with one exception. Three of the universities do have an international focus. Yet, their foci have minimal overlap. Finally, I suggest that key aspects of Swedish culture, including safety, and a need aid to the poor, help explain the extensive funding these centers and programs receive to survive. 

Emergency department triage scales and their components : a systematic review of the scientific evidence

Emergency department (ED) triage is used to identify patients' level of urgency and treat them based on their triage level. The global advancement of triage scales in the past two decades has generated considerable research on the validity and reliability of these scales. This systematic review aims to investigate the scientific evidence for published ED triage scales. The following questions are addressed: 1. Does assessment of individual vital signs or chief complaints affect mortality during the hospital stay or within 30 days after arrival at the ED? 2. What is the level of agreement between clinicians' triage decisions compared to each other or to a gold standard for each scale (reliability)? 3. How valid is each triage scale in predicting hospitalization and hospital mortality? A systematic search of the international literature published from 1966 through March 31, 2009 explored the British Nursing Index, Business Source Premier, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed. Inclusion was limited to controlled studies of adult patients (≥15 years) visiting EDs for somatic reasons. Outcome variables were death in ED or hospital and need for hospitalization (validity). Methodological quality and clinical relevance of each study were rated as high, medium, or low. The results from the studies that met the inclusion criteria and quality standards were synthesized applying the internationally developed GRADE system. Each conclusion was then assessed as having strong, moderately strong, limited, or insufficient scientific evidence. If studies were not available, this was also noted. We found ED triage scales to be supported, at best, by limited and often insufficient evidence. The ability of the individual vital signs included in the different scales to predict outcome is seldom, if at all, studied in the ED setting. The scientific evidence to assess interrater agreement (reliability) was limited for one triage scale and insufficient or lacking for all other scales. Two of the scales yielded limited scientific evidence, and one scale yielded insufficient evidence, on which to assess the risk of early death or hospitalization in patients assigned to the two lowest triage levels on a 5-level scale (validity).

A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments

Background Overcrowding in emergency departments is a worldwide problem. A systematic literature review was undertaken to scientifically explore which interventions improve patient flow in emergency departments. Methods A systematic literature search for flow processes in emergency departments was followed by assessment of relevance and methodological quality of each individual study fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they did not present data on waiting time, length of stay, patients leaving the emergency department without being seen or other flow parameters based on a nonselected material of patients. Only studies with a control group, either in a randomized controlled trial or in an observational study with historical controls, were included. For each intervention, the level of scientific evidence was rated according to the GRADE system, launched by a WHO-supported working group. Results The interventions were grouped into streaming, fast track, team triage, point-of-care testing (performing laboratory analysis in the emergency department), and nurse-requested x-ray. Thirty-three studies, including over 800,000 patients in total, were included. Scientific evidence on the effect of fast track on waiting time, length of stay, and left without being seen was moderately strong. The effect of team triage on left without being seen was relatively strong, but the evidence for all other interventions was limited or insufficient. Conclusions Introducing fast track for patients with less severe symptoms results in shorter waiting time, shorter length of stay, and fewer patients leaving without being seen. Team triage, with a physician in the team, will probably result in shorter waiting time and shorter length of stay and most likely in fewer patients leaving without being seen. There is only limited scientific evidence that streaming of patients into different tracks, performing laboratory analysis in the emergency department or having nurses to request certain x-rays results in shorter waiting time and length of stay.