1 resultado para Self-similar (fractal) processes
em CUNY Academic Works
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (12)
- Aston University Research Archive (74)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (21)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (121)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (64)
- Brock University, Canada (16)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (6)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (62)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (17)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (12)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (3)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (3)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (23)
- Nottingham eTheses (3)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (16)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (25)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (75)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (12)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (3)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (10)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (3)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (11)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (51)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (42)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (53)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This article highlights the potential benefits that the Kohonen method has for the classification of rivers with similar characteristics by determining regional ecological flows using the ELOHA (Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration) methodology. Currently, there are many methodologies for the classification of rivers, however none of them include the characteristics found in Kohonen method such as (i) providing the number of groups that actually underlie the information presented, (ii) used to make variable importance analysis, (iii) which in any case can display two-dimensional classification process, and (iv) that regardless of the parameters used in the model the clustering structure remains. In order to evaluate the potential benefits of the Kohonen method, 174 flow stations distributed along the great river basin “Magdalena-Cauca” (Colombia) were analyzed. 73 variables were obtained for the classification process in each case. Six trials were done using different combinations of variables and the results were validated against reference classification obtained by Ingfocol in 2010, whose results were also framed using ELOHA guidelines. In the process of validation it was found that two of the tested models reproduced a level higher than 80% of the reference classification with the first trial, meaning that more than 80% of the flow stations analyzed in both models formed invariant groups of streams.