1 resultado para Differences-in-Differences method
em CUNY Academic Works
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (29)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (56)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (6)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (23)
- Brock University, Canada (19)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (16)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (12)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (57)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (8)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (41)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (3)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (16)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (5)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (115)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (12)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (81)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (19)
- Universidade do Minho (7)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (6)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (15)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (169)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (77)
- University of Washington (5)
Resumo:
This article highlights the potential benefits that the Kohonen method has for the classification of rivers with similar characteristics by determining regional ecological flows using the ELOHA (Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration) methodology. Currently, there are many methodologies for the classification of rivers, however none of them include the characteristics found in Kohonen method such as (i) providing the number of groups that actually underlie the information presented, (ii) used to make variable importance analysis, (iii) which in any case can display two-dimensional classification process, and (iv) that regardless of the parameters used in the model the clustering structure remains. In order to evaluate the potential benefits of the Kohonen method, 174 flow stations distributed along the great river basin “Magdalena-Cauca” (Colombia) were analyzed. 73 variables were obtained for the classification process in each case. Six trials were done using different combinations of variables and the results were validated against reference classification obtained by Ingfocol in 2010, whose results were also framed using ELOHA guidelines. In the process of validation it was found that two of the tested models reproduced a level higher than 80% of the reference classification with the first trial, meaning that more than 80% of the flow stations analyzed in both models formed invariant groups of streams.