Brand protection and the globalization of British business

In expanding on earlier analyses of the evolution of multinational business that have drawn from concepts of competition and innovation, this study examines the strategies used by British multinationals, between 1870 and 1929, to protect the global reputation of their brands, which were crucial to their survival and success. Even after the passage of new trademark legislation in 1876, enforcement of trademarks remained expensive, and often firms preferred to negotiate, rather than to prosecute violations. Many trademark imitators were based in the newly industrializing countries of the time—the United States, Germany, and Japan—and were part of the British export supply chains as licensees, franchisees, or wholesalers. British firms responded to infringements by lobbying governments, appointing local agents to provide intelligence, and collaborating with other firms.

Registering scents as community trade marks

While the registrability of scents as Community trade marks has become source of much controversy, the possibility of trademarking scents represents a great potential for the industry. In the aftermath of the Sieckmann case, which has raised the threshold of registrability for scent marks, companies have refrained from submitting new smell-mark applications. Despite the difficulties in registering scents as trademarks, however, it is not impossible to meet the Sieckmann criteria and file successful scent mark applications. This article explains how this could be possible; it reviews all objections in registering scents as trademarks and brings new light into this topic by way of a comprehensive analysis of the conditions under which scents can be registered as Community trade marks.