Over expression of Plk1 does not induce cell division in rat cardiac myocytes in vitro

BACKGROUND: Mammalian cardiac myocytes withdraw from the cell cycle during post-natal development, resulting in a non-proliferating, fully differentiated adult phenotype that is unable to repair damage to the myocardium, such as occurs following a myocardial infarction. We and others previously have shown that forced expression of certain cell cycle molecules in adult cardiac myocytes can promote cell cycle progression and division in these cells. The mitotic serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1), is known to phosphorylate and activate a number of mitotic targets, including Cdc2/Cyclin B1, and to promote cell division. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The mammalian Plk family are all differentially regulated during the development of rat cardiac myocytes, with Plk1 showing the most dramatic decrease in both mRNA, protein and activity in the adult. We determined the potential of Plk1 to induce cell cycle progression and division in cultured rat cardiac myocytes. A persistent and progressive loss of Plk1 expression was observed during myocyte development that correlated with the withdrawal of adult rat cardiac myocytes from the cell cycle. Interestingly, when Plk1 was over-expressed in cardiac myocytes by adenovirus infection, it was not able to promote cell cycle progression, as determined by cell number and percent binucleation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in contrast to Cdc2/Cyclin B1 over-expression, the forced expression of Plk1 in adult cardiac myocytes is not sufficient to induce cell division and myocardial repair.

Chemotherapeutic agents and gene expression in cardiac myocytes

It is becoming apparent that anti-cancer chemotherapies are increasingly associated with cardiac dysfunction or even congestive heart failure (Minotti et al., 2004; Eliott, 2006; Suter et al., 2004; Ren, 2005). Our data suggest that one of the contributing factors to the cardiotoxicitiy of these drugs may be the activation of the AhR-response (including the increased expression of Cyp1a1) and/or other detoxification program in cardiac myocytes themselves. The induction of such responses may have secondary effects (e.g. to increase the level of intracellular oxidative stress), which may influence the contractility or even survival of cardiac myocytes. Furthermore, the specific response of cardiac myocytes, both with respect to the metabolizing enzymes and the export channels, potentially differs from other cells (e.g. we failed to detect any increase in expression of other “classical” AhR-responsive genes, Ugt1a1 and Ugt1a6). This could account for, for example, the observation that doxoribicinol (the 13-hydroxy form of doxorubicin) accumulates in cardiac myocytes but not in hepatocytes (Del Tacca et al., 1985; Olson et al., 1988). Given the vulnerability of the heart and the almost irreparable damage that can be done by severe oxidative stress, further studies would seem to be merited specifically on the effects of chemotherapeutic agents on cardiac myocytes.