A review of currently available in-stream water-quality models and their applicability for simulating dissolved oxygen in lowland rivers

In this paper, a review is undertaken of the major models currently in use for describing water quality in freshwater river systems. The number of existing models is large because the various studies of water quality in rivers around the world have often resulted in the construction of new 'bespoke' models designed for the particular situation of that study. However, it is worth considering models that are already available, since an existing model, suitable for the purposes of the study, will save a great deal of work and may already have been established within regulatory and legal frameworks. The models chosen here are SIMCAT, TOMCAT, QUAL2E, QUASAR, MIKE-11 and ISIS, and the potential for each model is examined in relation to the issue of simulating dissolved oxygen (DO) in lowland rivers. These models have been developed for particular purposes and this review shows that no one model can provide all of the functionality required. Furthermore, all of the models contain assumptions and limitations that need to be understood if meaningful interpretations of the model simulations are to. be made. The work is concluded with the view that it is unfair to set one model against another in terms of broad applicability, but that a model of intermediate complexity, such as QUASAR, is generally well suited to simulate DO in river systems. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

L'environnement auditif au travail

À haute intensité, les deux principales sources d'inconfort physique au travail sont la chaleur et le bruit (Pellerin & Candas, 2003). Même à des intensités modérées et faibles, le bruit affecte les performances cognitives, y compris dans les tâches de bureau courantes, mais il le fait de plusieurs manières différentes selon la nature du bruit (par exemple, discours vs. non-discours, intensité sonore, variabilité et prévisibilité etc.) et le type de tâche dans laquelle l'individu ou le groupe est engagé. Il est un peu surprenant, donc, que les individus expriment souvent une préférence pour travailler dans des conditions de bruit modérées (Schlittmeier & Hellbrück, 2009). Les multiples formes de perturbation auditive nuisant aux performances cognitives sont examinées et comparées avec leurs avantages potentiels dans le cadre du travail, résultant du traitement du bruit de fond en termes de sens du lieu, d'apprentissage fortuit des régularités dans le monde auditif, et de commutation intelligente de l'attention.