Influence of shape and absorbing surface: a numerical study of railway noise barriers

Results are presented of a study of a performance of various track-side railway noise barriers, determined by using a two- dimensional numerical boundary element model. The basic model uses monopole sources and has been adapted to allow the sources to exhibit dipole-type radiation characteristics. A comparison of boundary element predictions of the performance of simple barriers and vehicle shapes is made with results obtained by using the standard U.K. prediction method. The results obtained from the numerical model indicate that modifying the source to exhibit dipole characteristics becomes more significant as the height of the barrier increases, and suggest that for any particular shape, absorbent barriers provide much better screening efficiency than the rigid equivalent. The cross-section of the rolling stock significantly affects the performance of rigid barriers. If the position of the upper edge is fixed, the results suggest that simple absorptive barriers provide more effective screening than tilted barriers. The addition of multiple edges to a barrier provides additional insertion loss without any increase in barrier height.

Multiple-edge noise barriers

A numerical model using boundary element techniques is discussed which enables the insertion loss for various noise barriers of complex profile and surface cover to be calculated. The model is applied to single-foundation noise barriers to which additional side-panels are added to create fork-like profiles. Spectra of insertion loss and mean insertion loss results over a range of receiver positions for a broadband source are presented. It is concluded that ‘multiple-edged’ barriers show a significant increase in acoustic-efficiency over a simple vertical screen. Adding lightweight side-panels would be a relatively inexpensive measure, and one which could be applied to barriers already in existence. This type of barrier would also allow the height of the construction to be kept to a minimum.

The combined effects of porous asphalt surfacing and barriers on traffic noise

There is considerable interest in the use of porous asphalt (PA) surfacing on highways since physical and subjective assessments of noise have indicated a significant advantage over conventional non-porous surfaces such as hot rolled asphalt (HRA) used widely for motorway surfacing in the UK. However, it was not known whether the benefit of the PA surface was affected by the presence of roadside barriers. Noise predictions have been made using the Boundary Element Method (BEM) approach to determine the extent to which the noise reducing benefits of PA could be added to the screening effects of noise barriers in order to obtain the overall reduction in noise levels