1 resultado para Bibliographic references
em CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (4)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (12)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (1)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (7)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (10)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (25)
- Escola Superior de Educação de Paula Frassinetti (1)
- Harvard University (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (27)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (22)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (179)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (27)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (511)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (18)
Resumo:
This paper presents findings of our study on peer-reviewed papers published in the International Conference on Persuasive Technology from 2006 to 2010. The study indicated that out of 44 systems reviewed, 23 were reported to be successful, 2 to be unsuccessful and 19 did not specify whether or not it was successful. 56 different techniques were mentioned and it was observed that most designers use ad hoc definitions for techniques or methods used in design. Hence we propose the need for research to establish unambiguous definitions of techniques and methods in the field.