46 resultados para cardiomyocyte differentiation
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (32)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (25)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (197)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (46)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (49)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (19)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Duke University (7)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (11)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (29)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (112)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (113)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (85)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (103)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (14)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
Resumo:
Text designers are likely to benefit from guidance on how to use typographic differentiation for emphasis. Three experiments use purposely-designed fonts to explore the size and nature of differences in the stylistic characteristics of fonts (weight, width, contrast, italic) which affect letter identification. Results indicate that words set in bold and expanded fonts, when alternated with words set in a Neutral test font, may impair performance, whereas changing to italic does not. Possible explanations are explored through measuring the physical and perceptual similarities of the test fonts.