The Assault on Human Rigths and the Resilience of the Andean Dream: Health Inequities in Ecuador. IV Annual Distinguished Lecture sponsored by the Center for Research on Ethnicity, Culture and Health; School of Public Health; University of Michigan

The point of departure for these reflections is life, since its protection is the central purpose encouraging the defense of human rights and of public health. Life in the Andes has an exceptional diversity. Particularly in Ecuador, my country, this diversity constitutes a characteristic sign that is expressed in two main forms: natural megadiversity and multiculturalism. Indeed, Ecuador’s small territory synthesizes practically all types of lifezones that exist on Earth, having received the gift of high average rates of solar energy and abundant nutritional sources, which have facilitated the natural reproduction of countless species that show their beautiful vitality in the variety of ecosystems that compose the Andean mountain range, the tropical plains, the Amazon humid forests, and the Galapagos Islands. But besides being a highly biodiverse country, it is also a plurinational and multi-cultural society, in which the activity of human beings, organized into social conglomerates of different historical and cultural backgrounds, have formed more than a dozen nations and peoples. Regrettably this natural and human wealth has not been able to bear its best fruits due to the violent operation of a deep social inequity – unfortunately also one of the highest in the Americas—which conspires against life and is reproduced in national and international inequitable relations. This structural inequity has changed its form throughout the centuries and currently has reached its highest and most perverse level of development.

La supremacía constitucional en Bolivia (Tema Central)

Este artículo analiza la supremacía de la Constitución, en el escenario boliviano, frente al resto de las normas que integran el ordenamiento jurídico. Se estudia de manera particular a los tratados internacionales –en particular aquellos que forman parte del Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos– en relación al debate sobre su jerarquía en el ordenamiento jurídico boliviano y, en particular, frente a la Constitución. Finalmente, se precisa la jerarquía que le corresponde a las normas propias de los pueblos indígenas, originarios y campesinos en el ordenamiento jurídico boliviano.

Criterios de interpretación en la nueva Constitución de Bolivia. Voluntad del constituyente vs. jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Tema Central)

En este artículo se analizará la posibilidad del Tribunal Constitucional Plurinacional de aplicar, como criterio de interpretación, la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, de forma preferente a la voluntad del constituyente boliviano como otro criterio de interpretación dispuesto expresamente, a ese efecto se tendrá en cuenta el rol de la interpretación constitucional y su relación con las normas internacionales de derechos humanos, el análisis de la posición jurídica de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el sistema jurídico boliviano, el efecto de la jurisprudencia de la Corte en la protección de derechos humanos, y el análisis de esta jurisprudencia en relación con la voluntad del constituyente como criterios de interpretación.