12 resultados para student feedback

em University of Southampton, United Kingdom


Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This is a presentation I put together to get students thinking about their digital university experience. The resulting discussions will be used to inform a survey sent out to all students to find out what parts of the digital university experience are important to them.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

These documents show the outcomes of surveys conducted by David Read in the School of Chemistry to find out about our students' expectations and perceptions of feedback, with a view to enhancing our provision and ensuring that student learning is maximised.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

These PowerPoint slides supported an ILIaD workshop in September 2016.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A summary document providing generic feedback on student performance encompassing the group presentation and the peer marking

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thursday 8th May Building 6 (Eustace) Room 1007, 15.00-16.40 Su & Elena Presenting: Groups: I, J, K, L Marking Groups: M, N, O, P Schedule and Topics 15.00-15.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 15.05-15.25 Group I: Sustainablity – responsiblities and legislation 15.25-15.45 Group J: Green IT – solutions and benefits 16.45-16.05 Group K: Open and linked data 16.05-16.25 Group L: What is Web Science? 16.25-16.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monday 12th May Building 34 Room 3001, 12.00-13.45 Su & Rikki Presenting: Groups: E, F, G, H Marking Groups: I, J, K, L Schedule and Topics 12.00-12.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 12.05-12.25 Group E: Creative commons, open source, open movements 12.25-12.45 Group F: Trolling, Banter, Cyber Hate, Online Bullying 12.45-13.05 Group G: Personal Privacy and Security 13.05-13.25 Group H: Crime online; cyber security 13.25-13.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tuesday 13th May Building 34 Room 3001, 16.15-17.45 Elena & Rikki/Jian Presenting: Groups: M, N, O, P Marking Groups: Q, R, S, T Schedule and Topics 16.15-16.20: Introduction and protocol for the session 16.20 Group M: Serious games – gaming as a driver for applications online 16.40 Group N: Open Education OERs 17.00 Group O: Big Data – the big picture 17.20 Group P: Rights and equality in the workplace 17.40-18.00: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monday 12th May Building 34 Room 3001, 10.00-12.45 Su & Rikki Presenting: Groups: Q, R, S, T Marking Groups: U, V, W, X Schedule and Topics 10.00-10.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 10.05-10.25 Group Q: Disablitites and rights – legal responsibilities 10.25-10.45 Group R: Computer Ethics, Professional bodies and accreditation 10.45-11.05 Group S: Digital divide 11.05-11.25 Group T: How the web is chaning the world: co-operation, co-creation, crowd funding and crowd sourcing 11.25-11.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thursday 15th May Building 02A Room 2077, 15.00-16.45 Elena & Rikki Presenting: Groups: U, V, W, X Marking Groups: A, B, C, D Schedule and Topics 15.00-15.05: Introduction and protocol for the session 15.05-15.25 Group U: Digital Literacies 15.25-15.45 Group V: Will MOOCs destroy face-to-face University Education? 15.45-16.05 Group W: Groupwork and leadership skills in MMORPGs 16.05-16.25 Group X: Tools and techniques for agile project management 16.25-16.45: Wash-up: feedback session for presentation groups

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Speaker: Patrick McSweeney Organiser: Time: 15/10/2014 11:00-11:45 Location: B32/3077 Abstract Having started at Southampton in 2005 I have seen quite a few changes to the way courses are taught and studied. I will reflect on some of the interesting changes I have observed and suggest their causes. As a practical example I will talk about codestrom, a peer feedback tool for learning programming. We have found that this teaching method has improved the student experience and reduced the work load for the module team. Together we will discuss how this and other recent developments can enable other teaching innovations which benefit staff as well as students. Hopefully the new class of PhD students will be able to contribute from the point of view of having recently been undergraduate students here and else where.