1 resultado para optimal penalties
em Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (29)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (85)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (116)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (71)
- CUNY Academic Works (7)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (8)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (8)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (33)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (23)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (12)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (16)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (36)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (114)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (10)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (23)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (48)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (72)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Connecticut - USA (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (25)
Resumo:
In this paper I consider the role of education poli-cies in redistribution of income when individuals differ in two aspects: ability and inherited wealth. I discuss the extent to which the rules that emerge in unidimensional settings apply also in the bidimen-sional setting considered in this paper. The main conclusion is that, subject to some qualifi cations, the same type of rules that determine optimal education policies when only ability heterogeneity is considered apply to the case where both parameters of heterogeneity are considered. The qualifi cations pertain to the implementation of the optimal alloca-tion of resources to education and not the way the optimal allocations fi rst- and second-best differ.