3 resultados para Hot spots, levels of delinquency, citizen’s security, critical areas, Bogotá.
em Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
Resumo:
El interés de esta monografía es analizar la incidencia de la estrategia de seguridad ciudadana de los Hot Spots en los niveles de delincuencia de Bogotá durante el periodo de la Alcaldía de Samuel Moreno 2009-2011, tomando como casos de estudio la Avenida 19 y la Zona Rosa (Chicó El Lago). Esta investigación se realiza desde los conceptos teórico-prácticos que ha arrojado el modelo de Hot Spot tras su aplicación en 18 ciudades del mundo, y que sirven como herramienta para analizar las transformaciones del delito en las zonas de estudio. De esta manera se avanza hacia el resultado que permite identificar los factores que impidieron que el modelo de Hot Spots se formulara y ejecutara efectivamente y por lo tanto no disminuyera los niveles de delincuencia en Bogotá.
Resumo:
Over the last decades the issue of insecurity due to an increase in crime rates and its possible impact on the stability of Latin American democracies has sparked an ongoing debate. In this context, the present article studies, for the case of Argentina, how experiences and sensations of insecurity may be articulated to demands for greater punitive rigor. The analysis is based on two types of information. Initially, data from international surveys such as Latinoabarometer are considered. Then, these are compared to data from prolonged on-site observations in a poor neighborhood of a mid-sized Argentine city. The combination of these different types of data shows the complexity of the process. Contrary to what is often assumed, experiences and sensations of insecurity do not lineally lead to demands for greater punitive rigor. The way in which social actors elaborate their experiences of insecurity is highly situational and not systematic. We have found that there is not necessarily a consistent process of ‘meaning construction’ that articulates experiences and sensations of insecurity with political demands.
Resumo:
Law is often the source of social discriminations, but, at the same time, it can be thekey to delete these social discriminations. The authors try to give an example of thisphenomenon, by analyzing the impact of the Italian citizenship’s rules over the descendantsof the Italian citizens emigrated abroad and, especially, in South America.Indeed, according to the former Italian law, only fathers could transmit iure sanguinisthe citizenship to their children: moreover, women automatically lost theItalian citizenship if they get a foreign citizenship by concluding a marriage witha foreign husband.These rules hardly discriminate the Italian women emigrated abroad and, especially,their descendants who were prevented to get the Italian’s citizenship.These discriminatory rules were finally deleted by the Italian Constitutional Courtin the Seventies and in the Eighties: however, the effects of those rules still persisted,since the decision of the Constitutional Court could not overcome the temporal limit of the entry into force of the Constitution (01.01.1948) and, therefore, could not“cover” the discriminatory facts occurred before that date.Finally in 2009, the Italian Supreme Court, by extending the effects ratione temporisof the decisions of the Constitutional Court, “reopened the doors” of the Italiancitizenship to a huge number of Italian citizenship born from Italian women beforethe 01.01.1948.Therefore, the authors focus on the social impact of this decision for all the potentialItalian citizens living in South America and try to assess its juridical effects overthe Italian law.