Cáncer gástrico en Colombia entre 2000 y 2009

Introducción: De todos los casos de cáncer en el mundo el 80% se presentan en países en vía de desarrollo siendo el cáncer de estómago o cáncer gástrico la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer en el mundo con aproximadamente 700.000 muertes cada año. En Colombia, el cáncer gástrico es la primera causa de muerte por tumores malignos en ambos sexos, aún cuando no es la primera neoplasia en frecuencia. Metodología: Estudio observacional descriptivo, de registros de defunción del DANE, Colombia 2000 a 2009. Se analizaron tasas anuales crudas y por grupos de edad, género, procedencia geográfica, estado civil, nivel educativo y área de residencia habitual estableciendo diferencias estadísticas entre las variables y sus categorías. Resultados: En el período estudiado se registraron 43759 defunciones por cáncer gástrico, con mayor frecuencia en hombres 1,5:1. Las tasas de mortalidad por cáncer gástrico ajustadas por grupos etáreos aumentan después de la quinta década de la vida. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en todos los años estudiados y el departamento de residencia habitual del fallecido presentando Cauca (18,11- 19) y Boyacá (14,54-1742) las tasas más altas por 100.000 habitantes. Las tasas más altas se concentran en la zona de la Cordillera de los Andes, al estandarizar por grupos etáreos el Cauca tiene una tasa de 114,98 casos por 100.000 habitantes. Conclusión: El cáncer gástrico es la neoplasia que causa más muertes en Colombia por lo cual es necesario diseñar e implementar programas de detección precoz que vayan dirigidos al control de la mortalidad.

The regulation of Internet content. A qualitative, Colombian and comparative law study

 The incursion of Internet has created new forms of information and communication. As a result, today’s generation is culturally socialized by the influence of information and communication technologies in their various forms. This has generated a series of characteristics of social and cultural behaviour which are derivative of didactic, academic or recreational use. Nevertheless the use of the Internet from an early age represents not only a useful educational tool; it can constitute a great danger when it is used to access contents unsuitable for their adaptive development. Accordingly, it is necessary to study the legal regulation of internet content and to evaluate how such regulation may affect rights. Further, it is also important to study of the impact and use of this technological tool at level of the familiar unit, to understand better how it can suggest appropriate social mechanisms for the constructive use of Internet. The present investigation involves these two aspects with the purpose of uniting the legal and social perspective in a joint analysis that allows one more a more integral vision of this problem of great interest at the global level. 

Face and content validity of smoking-related and matched control pictures

Smoking-related pictures and matched controls are useful tools in experimental tasks of attentional bias. Noteworthy the procedures used to produce and validate these pairs of pictures are poorly reported. This study aimed to describe the production and evidence of validity of a set of smoking-related pictures and their matched controls. Two studies were conducted to assess validity. An online internet-based survey was used to assess face validity of 12 pictures related to smoking behavior and 12 matched controls. All pictures were colored and were 95mm length x 130mm width. Participants were asked if the pictures were related or not to the smoking behavior and also rated how much each picture was related to smoking behavior. The second study investigated attentional bias in smokers (n = 47) and non-smokers (n = 50), and examined how they assessed all pictures in terms of pleasantness and the 12 smoking-related pictures in terms of relevance to their own smoking behavior. Craving was assessed before and after the experiment. Results indicate that this set of pictures are valid since smoking-related pictures were considered more related to smoking behavior compared to their matched controls. Moreover, smokers showed greater attentional bias for smoking-related pictures than non-smokers. Craving and relevance of the smoking-related pictures were higher in smokers than in non-smokers. Smokers considered smoking-related pictures them less unpleasant than non-smokers. These findings provide evidence of face and content validity of this set of pictures, which will be available to researchers, contributing to maximize the standardization of future investigations.