16 resultados para Judgments (Theology)
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (18)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (12)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (64)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (19)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (72)
- Claremont University Consortium, United States (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (11)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (9)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (5)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (15)
- Duke University (4)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Harvard University (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (8)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (16)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (66)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (5)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (16)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (8)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (16)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (8)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (49)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (94)
- University of Michigan (188)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (77)
Resumo:
Previous research has shown that often there is clear inertia in individual decision making---that is, a tendency for decision makers to choose a status quo option. I conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate two potential determinants of inertia in uncertain environments: (i) regret aversion and (ii) ambiguity-driven indecisiveness. I use a between-subjects design with varying conditions to identify the effects of these two mechanisms on choice behavior. In each condition, participants choose between two simple real gambles, one of which is the status quo option. I find that inertia is quite large and that both mechanisms are equally important.