1 resultado para portfolio choice
em Universitat de Girona, Spain
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (8)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (8)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (15)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (120)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (8)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (8)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (165)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (20)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (17)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (44)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (177)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (123)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (37)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (21)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (13)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (47)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (10)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
Resumo:
In most psychological tests and questionnaires, a test score is obtained by taking the sum of the item scores. In virtually all cases where the test or questionnaire contains multidimensional forced-choice items, this traditional scoring method is also applied. We argue that the summation of scores obtained with multidimensional forced-choice items produces uninterpretable test scores. Therefore, we propose three alternative scoring methods: a weak and a strict rank preserving scoring method, which both allow an ordinal interpretation of test scores; and a ratio preserving scoring method, which allows a proportional interpretation of test scores. Each proposed scoring method yields an index for each respondent indicating the degree to which the response pattern is inconsistent. Analysis of real data showed that with respect to rank preservation, the weak and strict rank preserving method resulted in lower inconsistency indices than the traditional scoring method; with respect to ratio preservation, the ratio preserving scoring method resulted in lower inconsistency indices than the traditional scoring method