1 resultado para Self-Description Questionnaire II (versión breve)
em Universitat de Girona, Spain
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (12)
- Aston University Research Archive (19)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (14)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (16)
- Bioline International (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (9)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (12)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (99)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (20)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (22)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (3)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (53)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (9)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (19)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (21)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (157)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (3)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (3)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional dos Hospitais da Universidade Coimbra (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (64)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (6)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (15)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (14)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (8)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (6)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (12)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (9)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (34)
- University of Michigan (18)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (16)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
The main instrument used in psychological measurement is the self-report questionnaire. One of its major drawbacks however is its susceptibility to response biases. A known strategy to control these biases has been the use of so-called ipsative items. Ipsative items are items that require the respondent to make between-scale comparisons within each item. The selected option determines to which scale the weight of the answer is attributed. Consequently in questionnaires only consisting of ipsative items every respondent is allotted an equal amount, i.e. the total score, that each can distribute differently over the scales. Therefore this type of response format yields data that can be considered compositional from its inception. Methodological oriented psychologists have heavily criticized this type of item format, since the resulting data is also marked by the associated unfavourable statistical properties. Nevertheless, clinicians have kept using these questionnaires to their satisfaction. This investigation therefore aims to evaluate both positions and addresses the similarities and differences between the two data collection methods. The ultimate objective is to formulate a guideline when to use which type of item format. The comparison is based on data obtained with both an ipsative and normative version of three psychological questionnaires, which were administered to 502 first-year students in psychology according to a balanced within-subjects design. Previous research only compared the direct ipsative scale scores with the derived ipsative scale scores. The use of compositional data analysis techniques also enables one to compare derived normative score ratios with direct normative score ratios. The addition of the second comparison not only offers the advantage of a better-balanced research strategy. In principle it also allows for parametric testing in the evaluation