1 resultado para Dichotomous Choice
em Universitat de Girona, Spain
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (11)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (8)
- Archive of European Integration (13)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (8)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (99)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (8)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (70)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (8)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (10)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (139)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (17)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (5)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (17)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (10)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (156)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (96)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (22)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (20)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (8)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (41)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (107)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
In most psychological tests and questionnaires, a test score is obtained by taking the sum of the item scores. In virtually all cases where the test or questionnaire contains multidimensional forced-choice items, this traditional scoring method is also applied. We argue that the summation of scores obtained with multidimensional forced-choice items produces uninterpretable test scores. Therefore, we propose three alternative scoring methods: a weak and a strict rank preserving scoring method, which both allow an ordinal interpretation of test scores; and a ratio preserving scoring method, which allows a proportional interpretation of test scores. Each proposed scoring method yields an index for each respondent indicating the degree to which the response pattern is inconsistent. Analysis of real data showed that with respect to rank preservation, the weak and strict rank preserving method resulted in lower inconsistency indices than the traditional scoring method; with respect to ratio preservation, the ratio preserving scoring method resulted in lower inconsistency indices than the traditional scoring method