Familiale Bewegungssozialisation

Familiale Bewegungssozialisation – Zum Einfluss der Herkunftsfamilie auf die Bewegungssozialisation von Grundschulkindern. Die zentrale Fragestellung der Schrift ist, welchen Einfluss die soziale Herkunft auf die Bewegungssozialisation und Bewegungsentwicklung von Kindern im Grundschulalter hat. Die Auswirkungen sozialer Ungleichheit auf die Bewegungssozialisation, insbesondere die motorische Entwicklung, wurden in der Sportwissenschaft noch unzureichend untersucht. Der Arbeit liegt die Sozialisationstheorie von Witte (1994) zugrunde; mit ihrer Hilfe wird versucht die motorische Entwicklung theoriegeleitet zu erklären. Dafür werden Merkmale der Bewegungssozialisation und der motorischen Entwicklung in das theoretische Rahmenkonzept von Witte (1994) eingesetzt. Zu Beginn (Kapitel 1) erklärt die Arbeit den Begriff der sozialen Herkunft. Es werden der soziale Status, die Familienform und der Migrationshintergrund als Bestandteile der sozialen Herkunft definiert. Im weiteren Verlauf (Kapitel 2) wird die Sozialisationsinstanz Familie und die verschiedenen Familienformen vor dem Hintergrund sozialer Ungleichheit dargelegt. Das dritte Kapitel widmet sich dem sozialisationstheoretischen Konzept. Es werden die Sozialisationstheorie von Hurrelmann, die Körper- und Bewegungskarriere von Baur und das theoretische Rahmenkonzept der Sozialisation von Witte erklärt. Kapitel 4 beschreibt den Forschungsstand und Kapitel 5 stellt die Modellbildung und die Herleitung der Hypothesen dar. Die empirische Untersuchung fand an ausgewählten Grundschulen der Stadt Kassel statt. Insgesamt wurden 251 Kinder im Alter von 7-10 Jahren mit dem AST 6-11 untersucht und deren Eltern mit einem eigens entwickelten Fragebogen befragt. Die Daten wurden mit Hilfe von multivariaten Verfahren in Beziehung zueinander gesetzt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass sich Grundschulkinder hinsichtlich ihrer motorischen Entwicklung nicht in Abhängigkeit der sozialen Herkunft unterscheiden. Jedoch ist das Sportklima der Familien sehr stark abhängig von der sozialen Herkunft. Es wird deutlich, dass Kinder aus sozial benachteiligten Familien, aus Ein-Eltern-Familien und mit Migrationshintergrund schlechtere Möglichkeiten haben sich in ihrer Bewegungssozialisation zu entfalten. Die Prüfung des Sozialisationsmodells zeigt, neben der guten Operationalisierbarkeit des Modells, dass die Modellvariable „Orientierung“ (Orientierung der Familie hinsichtlich der Bedeutung von Bewegung und Sport) den größten Einfluss auf die Bewegungssozialisation von Kindern hat.

Characteristics, socioeconomic benefits and household livelihoods of beef buffalo and beef cattle farming in Northeast Thailand

Since the Thai economy experiences rapid growth, agricultural systems, i.e. crop-livestock systems, are changing rapidly. On account of these changes, buffalo and cattle production has to be re-examined in terms of performance characteristics and roles of livestock for farm households in order to initiate suitable development programmes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the present characteristics of beef buffalo and beef cattle farms in Northeast Thailand. Using a semi-structured questionnaire, 121 randomly selected beef buffalo and beef cattle farms were interviewed in Nakhon Ratchasima province between October 2007 and May 2008. Both buffaloes and cattle were mostly integrated in mixed crop-livestock systems with medium to large farm sizes (7.9 ha), whereof less than half of the area was used for livestock. Family members were mainly responsible for the different activities of livestock farming and salaried labourers were only found on large-scale farms. The dominant roles of livestock were income generation to build up wealth or savings, the coverage of expected and unexpected expenses and earning of regular and additional income. Another important issue was the improvement of the social status, which increased with herd size. In order to improve farmers’ livelihoods and develop sustainable farming systems in Northeast Thailand the changing economic circumstances of cattle and especially buffalo production should receive more attention of researchers, governmental institutions and stakeholders.

The social dimension: a neglected policy item in the Bologna Process

Since its beginning in 1999, the Bologna Process has influenced various aspects of higher education in its member countries, e.g., degree structures, mobility, lifelong learning, social dimension and quality assurance. The social dimension creates the focus of this research. The social dimension entered the Bologna Process agenda in 2001. Despite a decade of reforms, it somehow remained as a vague element and received low scholarly attention. This research addresses to this gap. Firstly, different meanings of the social dimension according to the major European policy actors are analysed. Unfolding the understandings of the actors revealed that the social dimension is mostly understood in terms reflecting the diversity of population on the student body accessing to, progressing in and completing higher education, with a special concern on the underrepresented groups. However, it is not possible to observe a similar commonality concerning the actual policy measures to achieve this goal. Divergence occurs with respect to the addressed underrepresented groups, i.e., all underrepresented groups or people without formal qualifications and mature learners, and the values and institutional interests traditionally promoted by these actors. Secondly, the dissertation discusses the reflection of this social dimension understanding at the national level by looking at cases of Finland, Germany and Turkey. The in-depth analyses show an awareness of the social dimension among most of the national Bologna Process actors and a common understanding of the social dimension goals. However, this understanding has not triggered action in any of the countries. The countries acted on areas which they defined problematic before the Bologna Process. Finally, based on these findings the dissertation discusses the social dimension as a policy item that managed to get into the Bologna Process agenda, but neither grew into an implementable policy, nor drop out of it. To this aim, it makes use of the multiple streams framework and explains the low agenda status social dimension with: i. the lack of a pressing problem definition: the lack of clearly defined indicators and a comprehensive monitoring system, ii. the lack of a viable solution alternative: the proposal of developing national strategies and action plans closed the way to develop generic guidelines for the social dimension to be translated into national policy processes, iii. low political perceptivity: the recent trends opt for increasing efficiency, excellence and exclusiveness discourses rather than ensuring equality and inclusiveness iv. high constraints: the social dimension by definition requires more public funding which is less appreciated and strategic constraints of the actors in allocating their resources v. the type of policy entrepreneur: the social dimension is promoted by an international stakeholder, the European Students’ Union, instead of the ministers responsible for higher education The social dimension remains a policy item in the Bologna Process which is noble enough to agree but not urgent enough to act on.