Multi-Scale Governance of Sustainable Natural Resource Use—Challenges and Opportunities for Monitoring and Institutional Development at the National and Global Level

In a globalized economy, the use of natural resources is determined by the demand of modern production and consumption systems, and by infrastructure development. Sustainable natural resource use will require good governance and management based on sound scientific information, data and indicators. There is a rich literature on natural resource management, yet the national and global scale and macro-economic policy making has been underrepresented. We provide an overview of the scholarly literature on multi-scale governance of natural resources, focusing on the information required by relevant actors from local to global scale. Global natural resource use is largely determined by national, regional, and local policies. We observe that in recent decades, the development of public policies of natural resource use has been fostered by an “inspiration cycle” between the research, policy and statistics community, fostering social learning. Effective natural resource policies require adequate monitoring tools, in particular indicators for the use of materials, energy, land, and water as well as waste and GHG emissions of national economies. We summarize the state-of-the-art of the application of accounting methods and data sources for national material flow accounts and indicators, including territorial and product-life-cycle based approaches. We show how accounts on natural resource use can inform the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and argue that information on natural resource use, and in particular footprint indicators, will be indispensable for a consistent implementation of the SDGs. We recognize that improving the knowledge base for global natural resource use will require further institutional development including at national and international levels, for which we outline options.

El FONVIS: su trayectoria institucional en el contexto sociopolitíco venezolana de 1980 a 2004

In Venezuela wurden ab 1989 als Reaktion auf die Zahlungsunfähigkeit des Landes erste neoliberale Strukturanpassungsmaßnahmen eingeleitet. Eine daraus resultierende zusätzliche Belastung der armen Bevölkerung mündete in einen völlig unerwarteten, massiven sozialen Aufruhr, dem sogenannten caracazo von 1989. Als eine Antwort darauf gründete die Regierung in Kooperation mit der Interamerikanischen Entwicklungsbank (BID) den venezolanischen Sozialfond FONVIS, der die sozialen Auswirkungen der neoliberalen Anpassung abfedern sollte. In diesem working paper werden unter Berücksichtigung der nationalen Kontextbedingungen die historische Entwicklung und die verschiedenen Konfigurationen des FONVIS beschrieben und analysiert. Als international gefördertes Implementierungsinstrument startete der Fonds mit einer Armutsbekämpfungspolitik, die den Ausbau von sozialer Infrastruktur sowie die Unterstützung des venezolanischen Dezentralisierungsprozesses fokussierte. Mit dem Regierungsantritt von Hugo Chávez 1999 hatte der Fonds dann in einem zunehmend schwierigeren Kontext zu operieren: Durch den Aufbau von neuen zentralstaatlichen sozialpolitischen Instrumenten und regierungsnahen ad hoc-Instanzen wurde der FONVIS zunehmend von einer anfänglich wichtigen Stellung innerhalb der nationalen Sozialpolitik ins institutionelle Abseits verdrängt und schließlich Ende 2005 offiziell aufgelöst. Die hier analysierte Performance des FONVIS macht deutlich, dass in der venezolanischen Fondslandschaft sich nur schwer eine breit entfaltete Multi-Level-Governance entwickeln konnte, weil der nationalstaatliche Kontext die Fondspolitik in allen Momenten dominierte. Schließlich leitete der Staat sogar ohne weitere Absprachen weder mit der internationalen noch regionalen und lokalen Ebene die Abschaffung des Fonds ein.

An Inquiry of Changes in Environmental Governance by Community-driven Process

Urban environmental depletion has been a critical problem among industrialized-transformed societies, especially at the local level where administrative authorities’ capacity lags behind changes. Derived from governance concept, the idea of civil society inclusion is highlighted. Focusing on an agglomerated case study, Bang Plee Community in Thailand, this research investigates on a non-state sector, 201-Community organization, as an agent for changes to improve urban environments on solid waste collection. Two roles are contested: as an agent for neighborhood internal change and as an intermediary toward governance changes in state-civil society interaction. By employing longitudinal analysis via a project intervention as research experiment, the outcomes of both roles are detected portrayed in three spheres: state, state-civil society interaction, and civil society sphere. It discovers in the research regarding agglomerated context that as an internal changes for environmental betterment, 201-Community organization operation brings on waste reduction at the minimal level. Community-based organization as an agent for changes – despite capacity input it still limited in efficiency and effectiveness – can mobilize fruitfully only at the individual and network level of civil society sectors, while fails managing at the organizational level. The positive outcomes result by economic waste incentive associated with a limited-bonded group rather than the rise of awareness at large. As an intermediary agent for shared governance, the community-based organization cannot bring on mutual dialogue with state as much as cannot change the state’s operation arena of solid waste management. The findings confine the shared governance concept that it does not applicable in agglomerated locality as an effective outcome, both in terms of being instrumental toward civil society inclusion and being provocative of internal change. Shared environmental governance as summarized in this research can last merely a community development action. It distances significantly from civil society inclusion and empowerment. However, the research proposes that community-based environmental management and shared governance toward civil society inclusion in urban environmental improvement are still an expectable option and reachable if their factors and conditions of key success and failure are intersected with a particular context. Further studies demand more precise on scale, scope, and theses factors of environmental management operation operated by civil society sectors.